The rebates are coming
President Bush said he would sign the $152 billion economic stimulus package into law next week. Senate Democrats almost bogged down the bill by trying to lard it up with extended unemployment benefits and home-heating subsidies, said The Wall Street Jour
What happened
President Bush said he would sign the $152 billion economic stimulus package into law next week. The Senate passed the measure after Democrats gave up on adding extended unemployment benefits, home-heating subsidies, and other amendments unpopular with Republicans. Bush thanked Congress for quickly passing the package, which includes tax-rebate checks that could arrive in May. "This bill reflects our principles," Bush said. "It is robust, it is pro-growth, it stimulates business investment and it puts money into the hands of American consumers." (Reuters in Yahoo! News)
What the commentators said
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So much for "'postpartisan' beltway harmony"? said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Senate Democrats ignored the deal struck between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the White House, and almost bogged down the stimulus package by trying to lard it up with "antistimulus ideas," including extended unemployment benefits, which would have increased the time people spent jobless, and home heating subsidies, which would have encouraged greater energy use.
"The package has serious omissions," said The Denver Post in an editorial. And "we confess to shuddering at the very idea of borrowing more money in a year in which the total federal deficit, including this stimulus package, will probably exceed $400 billion." But when it comes to pumping money into a "faltering" economy, "better quick than never."
The "usual rap" against spending government money to stimulate the economy, said Paul Krugman in The New York Times (free registration), is that it takes so long to get going that the recession is over before the money "starts flowing." But this time could be different. With the double-whammy of the credit crunch and the bursting of the housing bubble, the troubles we're facing now could "persist for a long time—say, into the middle of 2010."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Strava vs. Garmin: the row splitting the running community
Under The Radar The legal dispute between the two titans of exercise tech is like ‘Mom and Dad fighting’
-
Bad Bunny: Why MAGA is incensed
Feature The NFL announced Latino artist Bad Bunny as the Super Bowl halftime headliner, sparking MAGA outrage
-
Supreme Court: Judging 20 years of Roberts
Feature Two decades after promising to “call balls and strikes,” Chief Justice John Roberts faces scrutiny for reshaping American democracy