International envoy Kofi Annan says that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has agreed to a new approach to peace after the collapse of an April ceasefire deal with rebels. Opposition leaders have said that they're skeptical Assad will ever end the brutal crackdown that they say has resulted in 17,000 deaths since a pro-democracy uprising began last year. Annan said he would discuss the new proposal — which would focus on calming the most violent areas first — with rebel groups soon. Annan met Tuesday with officials in Iran, a staunch ally of Assad's regime that Annan said could play a "positive role" in ending the bloodshed. White House spokesman Jay Carney questioned how anyone could argue "with a straight face" that Iran is a force for peace in Syria. If Syria's first ceasefire agreement failed, is there really any hope that a second one that relies on help from Tehran will fare any better?
This idea was doomed from the start: Annan's "latest misstep" is a doozy, says Reid Smith at The American Spectator. Iran has been propping up Assad and his cronies for years with political and military support — Tehran isn't part of the solution, it's part of the problem. The U.S. and the Syrian opposition know Iran won't help. Inviting Tehran to discuss "peace, security, and a post-Assad Syria" is, as one analyst put it, like "inviting vegetarians to a barbecue."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
