Could Amy Winehouse's death verdict be overturned?
The coroner who ruled that the singer met "death by misadventure" was, it turns out, unqualified for her job. Will that nullify her findings?
What exactly killed Amy Winehouse? Though that question had supposedly been (finally) put to rest, British authorities have discovered that Suzanne Greenaway, the coroner who led the inquest into the singer's death last year, was unqualified for her position — raising the possibility that her verdict may be overturned. Here, a brief guide:
What did the original investigation say?
Greenaway ruled in October that Winehouse had died from accidental alcohol poisoning. After hearing evidence from a pathologist, Winehouse's doctor, and the security guard who discovered the singer dead in her bedroom — alongside three empty vodka bottles — Greenaway delivered the official verdict of "death by misadventure." The consensus theory: Sudden binge drinking caused Winehouse, who'd been sober for several weeks, to suffer alcohol poisoning.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But Greenaway wasn't qualified?
Apparently not. Though Greenaway practiced law for a decade in her native Australia, reports Owen Bowcott at the U.K.'s Guardian, she didn't have the five years of experience as a U.K. lawyer that Britain requires of assistant deputy corners. She was appointed by her husband Andrew Reid, the coroner for inner north London. "I believed at the time that her experience as a solicitor and barrister in Australia satisfied the requirements of the post," Reid said in a statement Wednesday, calling the appointment "an error in good faith." Greenaway actually resigned in November, the Associated Press reports, but the news is just now coming to light.
So the investigation will have to be reopened?
Verdicts that Greenaway delivered in 12 cases — including Winehouse's — are now subject to be challenged in High Court, says MSNBC. Her judgments could be ruled illegal, and the individual investigations reopened. Still, reports The Sun, which broke the news, "officials insist this will only happen if verdicts are challenged in the Hight Court," and that decision is up to the families of the deceased in each case.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What will Winehouse's family do?
Time will tell. In a statement, they said they are "taking advice on the implications of this and will decide if any further discussion with the authorities is needed." On Wednesday morning, Winehouse's father, Mitch, tweeted, "Don't worry about coroner nonsense. We are all ok." Defending his wife and his decision to appoint her, Reid says that he is "confident that all of the inquests handled were done so correctly." Nonetheless, he is writing to the families of those affected and offering to rehear the cases.
Sources: Associated Press, Guardian, MSNBC, Sun, Twitter, Week
-
Is Elon Musk about to disrupt British politics?
Today's big question Mar-a-Lago talks between billionaire and Nigel Farage prompt calls for change on how political parties are funded
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
The complaint that could change reality TV for ever
In the Spotlight A labour complaint filed against Love Is Blind has the potential to bolster the rights of reality stars across the US
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Assad's fall upends the Captagon drug empire
Multi-billion-dollar drug network sustained former Syrian regime
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published