Is the Kindle Fire too cheap?

Many analysts estimate that Amazon is hawking its new $199 tablet at a loss. Does that make good business sense?

The Kindle Fire tablet
(Image credit: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Amazon surprised much of the tech world when it announced last week that its new Kindle Fire tablet, which boasts a 7-inch color touchscreen, would retail for just $199 — less than half of what the cheapest iPad ($499) goes for. Many analysts estimate that, given the Fire's likely manufacturing costs, Amazon is actually selling it at a loss. Why? Presumably to challenge the iPad's dominance and get customers to buy more Amazon e-books, which they can read on the Fire. Is this a good business strategy?

No. This is a dead end: Amazon is counting on Kindle Fire owners buying oodles of the e-tailer's digital entertainment content, says Horace Dediu at Asymco. But "the margins for Kindle content are thin" already. And that limited profitability may make it harder for Amazon to constantly develop and release newer gadgets. Amazon apparently sees its first tablet as "the end of its evolutionary path," whereas Apple sees the 18-month-old iPad "as only the beginning."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up