What the experts say

A warning on exotic ETFs; How to play the dollar; Tax-credit headaches

A warning on exotic ETFs

Don’t be too proud of yourself if you’ve recently begun venturing beyond investing in “plain-vanilla” ETFs, said Christopher Emsden in The Wall Street Journal. A new report from the international Financial Stability Board describes the growth in specialized exchange-traded funds as a “disquieting” echo of the craze for exotic investments that helped fuel 2008’s meltdown. Already, almost half the ETFs issued in Europe are backed not by actual securities but by derivatives such as interest-rate swaps. Such “synthetic” securities expose ETF owners to the risk of default on the derivatives, just as buyers of AIG’s credit-default swaps stood to lose billions when AIG ran out of cash. Before investing in exotica such as “leveraged,” “inverse,” or “leveraged-inverse” ETFs, make sure you know what they’re made of and what protection ETF investors have against default.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Tax-credit headaches

The first-time-homebuyer tax credit that helped stimulate the housing market from 2008 to 2010 is now mostly stimulating aspirin sales, said Michelle Singletary in The Washington Post. Its name is somewhat deceiving: The “credit” is actually an interest-free government loan of up to $7,500 that buyers are required to repay in 15 annual installments—beginning this month with their tax filings. But the entire loan becomes due if a buyer sells the home. Such requirements are sowing confusion even inside the Internal Revenue Service, which admits now that it should have done a better job of sharing information about the loans.