What the experts say
Damned by the ‘halo effect’; Small stocks are so 2009

; Homes: Why zeros don’t sell
Damned by the ‘halo effect’
Financial advisors are supposed to help us overcome “our worst instincts” about investing, said Bob Frick in Kiplinger’s Personal Finance. Yet many people rely on gut reactions to choose an advisor in the first place. One study by Princeton University found that investors are more inclined to trust
 well-dressed advisors with prestigious degrees—so much so that they may 
neglect to do a background check. Called the “halo effect,” this can have a hellish impact on your portfolio. To truly size up an advisor, scrutinize potential picks based on “investing
 philosophy, methods, and results”—and always check references and
 credentials. Yes, you need to get along with your 
planner, but don’t fault him for being analytical rather than ingratiating. 

Small stocks are so 2009
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Small companies’ stocks have been market darlings for more than a year now, said Kopin Tan in Barron’s. Since early 2009, they’re up 111 percent, versus 79 percent for large stocks. Small-cap stocks often take the lead early in a recovery, but now “their 
blistering run may be on borrowed time.” If the market follows the same script that it did during the 2004 comeback, money managers will soon be shifting money away from risky small stocks and into large companies that can withstand
 rising interest rates and a maturing bull market, while “individual investors gingerly returning to the market” will likewise put their money with the big, familiar names. 

Homes: Why zeros don’t sell
Home sellers trying to grab buyers’ attention should avoid putting zeros in their sale prices, said Jack Hough in SmartMoney. Yet you don’t
 actually need to drop the price from $400,000 to $399,999 to make
 it seem cheaper. In fact, you could even raise the price—to, say,
 $401,298—and try to take advantage of the odd fact that people tend to subconsciously interpret precise numbers as being smaller than round ones. Well-researched by cognitive scientists, this effect has also been documented in the real world. One recent analysis of 
thousands of real estate transactions in South Florida and Long Island,
N.Y., found that houses originally listed without zeros did indeed fetch higher final prices than those for which bidding started at a round number.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published