The Gulf oil spill: Is burning it the answer?

The Coast Guard has set fire to part of the growing oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico. Is this really a good idea?

Oil on fire
(Image credit: YouTube)

With federal officials warning that the Gulf of Mexico oil spill could touch shore late Friday, the US Coast Guard is burning a contained part of the slick in an effort to keep it from spreading. British oil giant BP confirmed Thursday that the underwater oil leak — the result of a deadly explosion at a company-operated drilling rig — is five times bigger than originally thought. Will burning the crude prevent environmental damage, or just make matters worse? (Watch an AP report about the oil spill cleanup)

Burning the oil is the best option: "There are huge net environmental benefits" to burning the oil, says environmental engineer David F. Dickins, as quoted in The New York Times' Dot Earth blog, "compared to letting it stay on the surface or hit the coast." If conditions are right, fire can eliminate up to 90 percent of the oil — "no other technique is going to take that much oil out of the environment."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up