Feature

Supreme Court ruling: Pro-GOP?

Many observers believe the Supreme Court's momentous decision on campaign finance law favors Republicans.

In a landmark ruling in the case Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, a "bitterly divided" U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a century-old campaign finance law banning corporations from using their profits to support or oppose political candidates. The 5-4 decision allows businesses and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money to run their own campaign advertisements — a change that many observers believe will benefit Republicans, which historically have enjoyed stronger support from big business. In an official White House statement, President Obama said the Court "has given a green light to a new stampede of special interest money." Is the Court's ruling good for democracy — or just good for Republicans?

The Court's decision hurts Democrats — and democracy: With a single, "disastrous" blow, "the Supreme Court has thrust politics back to the robber-baron era of the 19th century," says The New York Times in an editorial. The Court's "conservative majority" — which "is deeply wrong on the law" — intentionally "distorted the political system to ensure that Republican candidates will be at an enormous advantage in future elections." The only way to "rescue democracy" is to overturn the decision.
"The Court's blow to democracy"

The ruling enhances our freedom of speech: Contrary to what liberals want you to believe, "the First Amendment is neither right nor left," says Investors Business Daily in an editorial. Rather than simply benefiting Republicans, the Court's ruling "protects all sides of every argument" — a necessary ingredient for "a vibrant, enlightened and open society." Remember, "the more information we have, the better off we are."
"The gag is removed"

More free speech is the last thing anybody — Republican or Democrat — needs: "The idea that more speech is always better" is simply "ridiculous," says University of Pennsylvania law professor Kermit Roosevelt III in The Christian Science Monitor. Our politics is already saturated with an incessant repetition of "misleading" campaign mantras from both sides of the aisle that "effectively drowns out competing voices." And this ruling only exacerbates the problem. More disturbing, however, is that "the justices in the majority seemed to be driven by" a belief "that we should trust corporations" more than our government. The ruling "is a sad comment on our democracy."
"Supreme Court ruling: Do we really trust corporations more than elected officials?"

Recommended

Suspected Chinese spy balloon was 200 feet tall, had airliner-sized payload
Chinese suspected spy balloon
Big Balloon

Suspected Chinese spy balloon was 200 feet tall, had airliner-sized payload

Powerful quake leaves at least 3,800 dead in Turkey and Syria
Ruined residential buildings in Marash, Turkey.
natural disasters

Powerful quake leaves at least 3,800 dead in Turkey and Syria

Protesters in India demand official investigation into Adani Group
Protests against Gautam Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in India.
Anger in India

Protesters in India demand official investigation into Adani Group

Health care workers stage massive walkout in U.K. over low wages
Healthcare workers protest in the United Kingdom.
They've Had Enough

Health care workers stage massive walkout in U.K. over low wages

Most Popular

7 toons about gun violence
Forget the vest, genetically modified silk may soon protect people from bullets.
Feature

7 toons about gun violence

The U.S. economy is shifting toward disinflation. Here's why that's welcome.
Discount pricing
Not getting worse

The U.S. economy is shifting toward disinflation. Here's why that's welcome.

United States shoots down Chinese spy balloon over Atlantic Ocean
A suspected Chinese spy balloon over Montana.
99 Red Balloons?

United States shoots down Chinese spy balloon over Atlantic Ocean