Israel’s battle in Gaza
As fighting conintues, what should Israel and Hamas do next?
What happened
Israel rejected a proposed 48-hour cease-fire Wednesday, after five days of ongoing airstrikes on Gaza. Hamas militants continued to launch rockets into southern Israel. Since fighting began Saturday, at least 370 Palestinians and four Israelis have been killed. Hamas ended a six-month cease-fire in mid-December. (The Washington Post)
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Hamas may have had this coming, said David Grossman in The New York Times, but Israel has made it’s point and should now return to its former “impressive level-headedness” in the face of the Palestinian attacks. A two-day cease-fire would be a good start, and could give Hamas “an honorable way of extricating itself from its own trap.” Even if it doesn’t, “Gaza’s innocent inhabitants” needn’t suffer the consequences.
Why is that Israel’s responsibility? said Seth Freedman in Britain’s The Guardian. “As soon as the six-month cease-fire ended, with Hamas refusing to lay down their weapons and resuming their attacks on Israeli civilians, it was plain that Israel was being invited, if not provoked into, an operation to cut the head off the hydra.”
“It is admittedly impossible to live with daily missile fire,” said Tom Segev in Israel’s Ha’aretz, “even if virtually no place in the world today enjoys a situation of zero terror.” But it’s important to remember that “Hamas is not a terrorist organization holding Gaza residents hostage”—it’s “a religious nationalist movement, and a majority of Gaza residents believe in its path.” Let’s also not forget that “no military operation has ever advanced dialogue with the Palestinians.”
Israel’s military mission is “is aimed against Hamas, not the Palestinian people,” said Akiva Tor in the San Francisco Chronicle. Israel is doing everything in its power “to target the military infrastructure of Hamas and to avoid harming civilians.” And although “this is tragic,” the alternative—“that Hamas prevail and ruin all chances of future peace—would be more tragic.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
But Israel’s attack on Gaza could backfire, said Juan Cole in Informed Comment. “Do the Israelis expect the population at some point to turn against Hamas, blaming it for the blockade and the bombardment?” It seems more likely that, “by destroying what was left of the Gaza middle class,” Israel could drive “people into the arms of Hamas.”
-
Is Elon Musk about to disrupt British politics?
Today's big question Mar-a-Lago talks between billionaire and Nigel Farage prompt calls for change on how political parties are funded
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
The complaint that could change reality TV for ever
In the Spotlight A labour complaint filed against Love Is Blind has the potential to bolster the rights of reality stars across the US
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Assad's fall upends the Captagon drug empire
Multi-billion-dollar drug network sustained former Syrian regime
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published