Lilly Allen the literary critic
The choice to include British pop singer Lilly Allen on the jury next year for the prestigious Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction, which is awarded to female authors, has sparked a debate over whether or not celebrities should judge literary contests. I s
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
What happened
The choice to include 22-year-old British pop singer Lilly Allen on the jury next year for the prestigious Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction, which is awarded to female authors, has sparked a debate over whether or not celebrities should judge literary contests. Joining Allen on the panel will be authors Philippa Gregory and Bel Mooney, journalist Kristy Lang, and Guardian Review editor Lisa Allardice.
What the commentators said
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
I sympathize “with those who query the paucity” of “serious critics (including authors) on book prize panels,” said Maya Jaggi in the Guardian Unlimited. Is it really possible for someone to “judge the originality or excellence of a work of fiction—two of the prize’s main criteria”—if he or she doesn’t possess “extensive, assiduously cultivated, knowledge of what has gone before?”
It’s true that Allen’s “greatest literary achievement was rhyming the words ‘door’ and ‘crackwhore’ in a song once,” said Stuart Heritage in the blog Heckler Spray. But Allen has “obviously been picked as an everyman judge, and her position as a role-model might even encourage more young girls to start reading for pleasure, when the bulk of them currently view it as a bit of a chore.”
Why is it that nowadays “the only people allowed, or paid, to offer any supposedly meaningful aesthetic opinions on anything are those who have achieved fame in some other area?” said Nicholas Lezard in the Guardian Unlimited’s Books blog. It’s really “patronizing, both to the authors being judged, and to the public, who are seen as not smart enough to be interested in anything unless a famous person is involved.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Political cartoons for February 11Cartoons Wednesday's political cartoons include erasing Epstein, the national debt, and disease on demand
-
The Week contest: Lubricant larcenyPuzzles and Quizzes
-
Can the UK take any more rain?Today’s Big Question An Atlantic jet stream is ‘stuck’ over British skies, leading to ‘biblical’ downpours and more than 40 consecutive days of rain in some areas