What the future holds in Iraq
Democrats have a new proposal to start bring troops home home from Iraq, but tens of thousands would remain in the country for years. U.S. officials are touting statistics showing a sharp drop in insurgent attacks, said Mark Kukis in Time.com, but "B
What happened
A new Democratic proposal to bring most U.S. troops home from Iraq would leave tens of thousands of soldiers in the country for several years. (Associated Press). American military commanders are preparing to give U.S. forces an expanded role in the training and support of Iraqis who will provide security once the U.S. withdraws. (The New York Times, free registration)
What the commentators said
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
U.S. officials have been touting statistics suggesting a sharp violence in insurgent attacks recently, said Mark Kukis in Time.com, but bombings are still a regular part of life for Iraqis. “Life in some parts of the city has taken on an air of normalcy, with shops and restaurants open at night. But even if the current level of calm holds, Baghdad remains the center of one of the bloodiest realms on Earth on any given day.”
War critics should stop harping on the Iraqi government’s failure to reach a few benchmarks, said Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post (free registration). They don’t have the oil and de-Baathification laws they need, it’s true, but all the “hard-won” security gains show there’s hope. The original path to victory hit a detour, but “it’s folly” to give up “when a different route, more arduous but still doable, is at hand and demonstrably working.”
Who’s talking about giving up? said Emory University psychology professor Drew Westen in The New Republic Online. “You don't have to cut off funding of the war precipitously to end the war. Just make the president pay for it: Demand that he show the courage (and use that word, with all its military connotations) to tell us who the Republican Iraq War Tax Increase Act of 2007 will target to pay for this war, because right now it is being paid for by our children and grandchildren.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 exclusive cartoons about Trump and Putin negotiating peace
Cartoons Artists take on alternative timelines, missing participants, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The AI arms race
Talking Point The fixation on AI-powered economic growth risks drowning out concerns around the technology which have yet to be resolved
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis world
In the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
By The Week UK Published