Is Blair stifling debate about Britains nukes?
The week's news at a glance.
United Kingdom
There’s a “dreary sense of inevitability” about Britain’s pursuit of more powerful nuclear weapons, said the London Guardian in an editorial. Don’t expect a public debate on this vital issue. Every time the country has faced a decision about whether and how to upgrade its nukes, the government of the day has made the choice “in secret.” In the 1970s, a Labor government upgraded to a Polaris system “without telling the public at all.” In the 1980s, a Conservative government announced the acquisition of the U.S.-made Trident system only after the deal was done. And now that the Trident submarines are nearing their sell-by date, the current, Labor government says it will roll out its white paper on what to do next before Christmas. That means the decision has already been made, and a subsequent parliamentary debate will be mere “window dressing.” Yet “where is the evidence that the decision must be taken this winter?” The subs and their missiles will last at least 15 more years.
Britons deserve an open debate on this issue, said London’s Daily Telegraph. The Trident system—four subs, each carrying 16 nuclear missiles—was chosen as our deterrent back when the West faced a single nuclear-armed enemy, the Soviet Union. Now, though, we face a decentralized threat of Islamic terrorist cells, as well as emerging nuclear rogue states in Iran and North Korea. A British nuclear deterrent is probably still necessary, but shouldn’t we debate what kind of deterrent? Is it best to have it sea-based, or should we consider another option? We also need to discuss where to purchase the weapons. After all, “the special relationship between Britain and America,” which supplies the Trident missiles, “has been called into question by the disaster of Iraq.” All these factors add up to an issue that a democratic society should decide democratically.
But our leaders don’t think we can handle the truth, said Richard Norton-Taylor in The Guardian. So Prime Minister Tony Blair and his heir presumptive, Chancellor Gordon Brown, are cheating the voters out of a vital discussion. In truth, there are four options we could choose from: extend the life of the current system, buy a new Trident system, buy a whole new system from some other manufacturer, or scrap nuclear weapons altogether. That last option merits serious consideration, particularly as “the government has yet to explain who now would be deterred by Trident.” So far the most compelling reason the government has for keeping nukes is that it can’t stomach “the prospect of France being Europe’s only nuclear power.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
James Blitz
Financial Times
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
How the far right media bubble failed Donald Trump
By ensconcing himself in the comfort of friendly — and increasingly conspiracy-driven — media, the former president is stuck in a feedback loop of his own making
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Shogun' dominates Emmys, 'Hacks' surprises
Speed Read 'Shogun' won a record 18 Emmys and 'Hacks' beat 'The Bear' in a surprise upset
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Ohio governor slams attacks on Haitian migrants
Speed Read Mike DeWine condemned the conspiracies boosted by Donald Trump and JD Vance about immigrants eating people's pets
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published