As Sudan's civil war enters its third year, diplomats and aid officials are meeting in London to address what the UN calls "the world's worst humanitarian crisis".
The summit, hosted by Britain, France, Germany, the EU and the African Union, "has modest ambitions", said The Independent. Rather than seeking peace, its goal is coordinating aid for the millions who are displaced and facing famine.
What did the commentators say? Officials organising the summit say the chances of a significant breakthrough are "slim", not least because the "warring parties" – the Sudanese government and the Rapid Support Forces paramilitary group – aren't invited, said The Telegraph.
Diplomats are mostly hoping that some consensus can be reached on "how to proceed towards talks". "But we can't just park it in the 'too complicated' pile," one aide told the paper. "That's what the world has done for two years."
The conference may "galvanise international actors", wrote Jehanne Henry for the Middle East Institute, but "additional pressure" will need to be applied on those "supplying or enabling" the warring sides, as well as on the warring sides themselves.
The US could help by pressing its allies in the Gulf, the UAE and Egypt to "stop fuelling the conflict". But there is "no shortcut" to sustainable peace". Any agreements will not be useful if Sudan remains "mired in conflict, criminality and extremism".
As fighting continues, the prospect of partition also looks increasingly likely. In February, the RSF announced plans to form a rival government. Yet "recent Sudanese history has shown that partition is not a risk-free solution to civil war", said The Conversation. Since South Sudan seceded in 2011, it has faced "enormous difficulties," including its own civil war, "intergroup violence, food insecurity and sanctions resulting from human rights violations".
What next? The two sides remain a "long way from seeking peace", said The Guardian. For now, diplomacy will focus on "securing a consensus among rival external backers that a ceasefire must be demanded and impunity for war crimes will end".
However, a "harsh spotlight" is likely to fall on the impact of Donald Trump's recent USAID cuts, which have hit humanitarian aid to Sudan. |