by Yuval Noah Harari
“Yuval Noah Harari writes well at the scale of the species,” said Daniel Immerwahr in The Atlantic. Since the publication of his unlikely 2011 blockbuster, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, the Israeli historian has displayed a zeal for big ideas and a “taste for provocative simplifications.” In Nexus, his “grimmest work yet,” Harari offers his take on how information technologies, from storytelling to mass media and beyond, have shaped human experience across several millennia. Bucking convention, “Harari rejects the notion that more information leads automatically to truth or wisdom,” arguing that new technologies have often spread misinformation, as the printing press did fears about witchcraft. Human access to larger stores of information has also led to artificial intelligence, “whose advent Harari describes apocalyptically.”
“As in his previous works, Harari’s writing is confident, wide-ranging, and spiced with humor,” said The Economist. “He draws upon history, religion, epidemiology, mythology, literature, evolutionary biology, and his own family biography, often leaping across millennia and back again within a few paragraphs. Some readers will find this invigorating; others may experience whiplash.” But his “strikingly original” take on information history, rooted in his belief that information is fundamentally a way of linking people and ideas, whether those ideas are wrong or right, also happens to arrive a moment when questions of truth and disinformation are “top of mind for voters—and readers.” The massive scale also suits the subject: Just as decisions made in the 4th century AD about what to include in the Bible had far-reaching and lasting consequences, Harari worries that humanity’s future will be shaped by decisions made today about AI.
“Reading Nexus is a strange experience,” said Michael Marshall in New Scientist. “The quality of the text lurches up and down: One minute you are reading something incisive, the next you are wading through banalities.” Harari “lucidly” explains how the Bible and other holy books were curated by institutions with their own agendas, and engagingly contrasts how information flows in democratic societies and dictatorships. But Nexus contains “many silly bits,” and the fears he expresses about AI in the book’s second half add nothing new to the conversation. Is this the best we can expect from a man described as one of the 21st century’s most influential public intellectuals? “It isn’t that there is nothing good in Nexus, but readers shouldn’t have to pick through a sludge of sloppy thinking for rare nuggets of insight.” |