The UK is unsuitable for fracking and its shale gas reserves have been "hyped", one of the country's leading geologists has claimed.
Professor John Underhill, chief scientist at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, believes the UK is "55 million years too late" for the gas extraction technique to work.
The government says that drilling into the earth and injecting liquid into rock at high pressure, forcing apart fractures and releasing gas, is a potentially lucrative source of energy. Opponents, however, claim fracking is harmful to the environment and affects the health of those who live nearby.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The amount of shale gas available in the UK is acknowledged to be "a great unknown", says the BBC.
Speaking to the broadcaster, Prof Underhill said his research on the influence of tectonic plates on the UK suggested the shale formations have been lifted, warped and cooled by tectonic action. He said the government would be "wise" to formulate a Plan B for the UK's future gas supply.
Mary Church, head of campaigns for Friends of the Earth Scotland, told The Independent that the report "adds weight to the already overwhelming case against fracking in Scotland, or indeed anywhere in these isles".
"Fracking presents a whole host of risks to people's health and our local environment," Church said, "while in the context of irreversible climate change, going after a new source of fossil fuels is quite literally the last thing we should be doing."
The government's own opinion tracker shows public support for fracking has fallen to 16 per cent, with opposition at 33 per cent. However, it also reported a lack of knowledge of the technology, with 48 per cent of people neither supporting nor opposing it.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
-
North Sea oil and gas ban: should Starmer U-turn on Labour pledge?Talking Point Environmental wing of the party at odds with unions over fossil fuels and path to a green future
-
The pros and cons of fracking
Pros and Cons New PM Liz Truss could revive controversial practice ‘within days’ due to Britain's energy woes
-
Shell’s North Sea oil U-turn: ‘a first victory in a longer war’?
Speed Read Controversy after oil giant pulls out of proposed Cambo project
-
Fires, floods and storms: America’s ‘permanent emergency’ has begun
Speed Read This summer of climate horror feels like the ‘first, vertiginous 15 minutes of a disaster movie’, says The New York Times
-
Hot air and empty rhetoric: is the UK acting too slowly on climate change?
Speed Read ‘Every day, new evidence accumulates that humanity is on an unsustainable path’
-
Germany floods: what led to this ‘once-in-a-century’ disaster?
Speed Read Nearly 200 people died in Germany and Belgium; hundreds are still unaccounted for
-
Total ban on imports of rubbish to China piles pressure on Asian neighbours
Speed Read Veto on accepting overseas junk marks culmination of three-year reduction policy
-
Penguin colony at risk as Somerset-sized iceberg bears down on British overseas territory
Speed Read Several species face starvation if the icy giant blocks access to feeding grounds
