"Nicola Sturgeon isn't someone for whom oversharing comes naturally," said The Spectator's political correspondent Lucy Dunn. Scotland's former first minister has "regularly been labelled 'dour' or 'frosty'" by both opponents and supporters. Her new memoir "Frankly" seems like "an attempt to shrug off that reservedness" and give people the chance to "see things from her point of view". But "her critics say she is less offering insight, more rewriting history".
'Nigh-on useless' It's definitely more the latter than the former, according to Shona Craven in The National. Two and a half years after Sturgeon was "grilled" about the implications for Scottish prison policy of saying "trans women are women", she still "stumbles" when asked if rapist Isla Bryson, who was sent to a woman's prison, is a man.
Sturgeon "began and continues to fight" the gender row, said Alan Cochrane in The Telegraph. This issue and others, like "the stupid coalition deal" she struck with the Scottish Greens and the "record drug deaths" in Scotland, brought the SNP "to its knees in last year's election". But her book is "getting pretty fair and positive licks in the media", because she "long ago completely conned a large part of the Fleet Street commentariat" into admiring her.
I agree that Sturgeon does have "many good qualities", said Cochrane, including a "wicked sense of humour", and she's a "more than decent public speaker". But it's her "gallus nature – Scots for chutzpah – much more than political judgment that's got her to where she is today".
'Nicola Was Right All Along' You might ask why "a fierce advocate for Scottish independence" chose London-based Pan Macmillan to publish her memoir, said Kevin McKenna in The Herald.
There is a "gulf" between those who saw her every day and those for whom she was "a more peripheral, and hence more idealised, figure", said The Times' Alex Massie, and it is obvious from the book's promotional blurbs. None are written by people who live in Scotland. Her autobiography is "designed to demonstrate, once and for all, that Nicola Was Right All Along".
But she "sidles away from the only obvious and inescapable verdict on her record": poor educational and health outcomes, despite Scotland's 25% higher spending per capita than England. "Still, it is a weakness of contemporary politics that good intentions are expected to substitute for good outcomes. In that respect, Sturgeon was an archetype of a particular type of political success." |