The Week UK
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jzblygzdxr1769609154.gif

SUBSCRIBE

Start your trial today

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • Saturday Wrap, from The Week
    Trump ‘sycophants’, the Aberfan anniversary, and a return to ‘oracy’

     
    controversy of the week

    Corruption in Trump-world: the downfall of Kimberly Guilfoyle

    In late 2024, Donald Trump faced a “ticklish family situation”, said Ruth Marcus in The New Yorker. Until recently, his eldest son had been engaged to Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former Fox News host who had become a prominent figure in Trump’s orbit. But the couple had split, and Donald Jr was now seeing someone else. “I had to get her out of here,” Trump reportedly told people, and he duly did – by appointing her as ambassador to Greece. 

    Guilfoyle was sacked from that role last week over corruption accusations. A Wall Street Journal exposé alleged that, before being confirmed to the post, she had pressured a Trump donor to pay off her $100,000 American Express bill in return for a promise of access to “the Trump world”. As ambassador, she reportedly bragged about Greek tycoons funding her luxury trips, and brought an energy company lobbyist along to so many meetings that people assumed he was her chief of staff. 

    Guilfoyle’s corruption was too blatant for Trump to ignore just before the midterms, said Nick Catoggio on The Dispatch: Democratic candidates are pushing hard on the corruption theme. But he can’t afford to alienate her entirely. As a Trump-world insider, she knows too much about “family malfeasance” to be exiled with no means of support. Trump will no doubt buy her silence by lining her up with a “well-paid sinecure” somewhere. For him, everything is transactional, said Eleanor Clift on The Daily Beast. He has shown Guilfoyle the door, but he could also offer her a pardon – “a powerful incentive to swallow her pride and accept Trump’s terms”. 

    In a Trump team that now consists almost exclusively of “sycophants and family members”, Guilfoyle is just a small-time grifter, said Tom Nichols in The Atlantic. The president has engaged in epic levels of self-dealing, and plenty of other, still-serving officials – from his envoy Jared Kushner to FBI director Kash Patel – have faced serious corruption claims. 

    Guilfoyle’s real sin was the “pathetic” nature of her behaviour. “Honey please I need you to get this done for me today,” she texted the donor when asking for the $100,000. “You know, I can deliver the world to you. Which you deserve,” she was recorded gushing to another US businessman. Guilfoyle made a fool of herself, and in so doing committed the worst crime of all: she embarrassed the boss. That was why she had to go.

     
     
    Briefing of the week

    The Aberfan disaster

    Sixty years ago this week, a colliery spoil tip collapsed on to a South Wales mining village, killing 116 children and 28 adults 

    How did the disaster start? 
    October 1966 saw an unusually high level of rainfall in South Wales, where the village of Aberfan sits near the bottom of the Taff Valley, four miles south of Merthyr Tydfil. Spoil from the Merthyr Vale coal mine had been dumped on Merthyr Mountain, 500 feet above the village, creating hundred-foot-high heaps of loose rock, clay, soil, coal waste and other debris.

    At 7.30am on Friday 21 October, the early shift noticed that Tip 7 – already known to be unstable, since it was sited over a spring – had subsided by more than 10 feet overnight. Workers went up to investigate. At 9.15am, they watched in horror as around 110,000 cubic metres of liquefied mine waste burst from the tip and vanished into the mist down the mountain. 

    Where did the landslide go? 
    Moving in waves 20-30 feet high, and at up to 20mph, it engulfed two farm cottages, killing everyone inside. Then it crossed a disused canal and railway embankment, destroying two buried water mains, which added 2-3 million gallons to the slurry. Finally, it crashed into Pantglas Junior School in Aberfan, and around 20 houses on Moy Road. Schoolchildren saw “a black wave of muck” coming down the slope with “trams, trees, trucks, bricks and boulders in it”. Survivors reported hearing a sound like thunder or a jet plane taking off, followed by an eerie silence. The mist made it hard to see what had happened; many villagers assumed there had been a gas explosion or a building accident at the school, where the roof was being repaired. 

    What happened at the school? 
    At 9.15am, teachers were still taking the register. The half-term break was due to start at midday. One teacher had time to make her pupils get under their desks in a classroom the landslide didn’t reach. But most survivors reported having no time to react: there was a rumbling sound, and then walls burst apart and the tall Victorian classrooms filled up with mud, sludge and rubble. Of the 240 children aged seven to 10 enrolled at the school, 109 were killed, along with five teachers (seven other children and 23 other adults were also killed).

    Miners – many of them school parents – arrived from the colliery within 20 minutes and took charge of digging out survivors. Emergency services and thousands of volunteers soon joined them, but no one was rescued alive after 11.15am, when Jeff Edwards, aged eight, was carried out of the wreckage. 

    What was the reaction? 
    By 10.30am, Aberfan was the top story on the BBC; it was the first disaster of its kind to be broadcast live into people’s homes, and a wave of national shock and mourning followed. The secretary of state for Wales, Cledwyn Hughes, was on the scene by 4pm. The prime minister, Harold Wilson, visited Aberfan that evening.

    However, Alfred Robens, chair of the National Coal Board (NCB), the body responsible for the mine, put off visiting until the next day (he was busy being invested as chancellor of the University of Surrey). A burial of 81 children and one woman took place in Aberfan six days after the disaster, attended by some 10,000 mourners. Donations to the Aberfan Disaster Fund poured in, reaching an unprecedented £1.75 million, worth over £40 million today. 

    Whose fault was the tragedy? 
    A public inquiry published its damning findings in August 1967. It found the disaster foreseeable and preventable, and the NCB wholly responsible – cataloguing its “ignorance” and “bungling ineptitude”. The tips violated the NCB’s own rules. The spring under Tip 7 (which Robens first claimed no one could have known about) was marked on the Ordnance Survey map; there had been smaller tip slips in 1944 and 1963; and various complaints, including from Merthyr Council, about the danger posed by the tips above the school, had been ignored.

    The inquiry singled out nine engineers and managers for varying degrees of blame; it also strongly criticised Robens’ stonewalling and factual inconsistency; Wilson wrote “devastating” on his copy. Robens offered to resign, though the offer was refused. However, to the shock of Aberfan, no one was prosecuted, fined, or even sacked over the tragedy. 

    Why was no one prosecuted? 
    The concept of corporate manslaughter was in its infancy in 1966. Mining was dangerous, and accidents were accepted; broad health-and-safety laws making employers responsible for identifying and mitigating risks had yet to be passed. And the NCB had enormous political power. Eventually, during the inquiry, it accepted liability; payments of £50 per head, later raised to £500, were given to bereaved parents; many did not receive this until the 1970s. The NCB successfully argued that it shouldn’t have to cover the cost of removing the remaining tips, which it claimed it had made safe. To defray part of the cost, the government forcibly took £150,000 from the disaster fund (this was paid back under New Labour). 

    What was the effect on Aberfan?
    Almost every family in the tightly knit community of 5,000 people was affected. The surviving children were terrorised – not least because the tips weren’t removed until 1969 – and avoided school. Post-traumatic stress disorder was little understood, and testimonies show that people largely did not talk about what had happened. Dr Alfred Jones, a local GP, described the village as consumed with guilt, psychological problems and alcoholism. He spoke of a “strange bitterness between families who lost children and those who hadn’t”.

    For years, children didn’t play in the streets, from an unspoken understanding that this would pain the bereaved; many of them didn’t open up about their experiences until they’d reached middle age. Merthyr Vale Colliery closed in 1989, and today the area scores highly for unemployment and deprivation.

    The ‘indispensable’ Lord Robens 
    Government papers released in 1997 showed that Alfred Robens’ offer to resign as chair of the NCB following Aberfan was in fact a sham. Robens demanded and got the report 10 days before it was published, and used the time to drum up support. The rejection of his offer to resign was agreed in advance, and he even got to determine the wording of the minister’s reply rejecting his resignation. 

    Robens got away with this because ministers thought he was indispensable. Nationalising the coal industry was one of the postwar Labour government’s proudest achievements, but coal was on the way out, and Robens had shown that he could run the NCB at a time of mass job losses without provoking major strikes. A former trade unionist and Labour MP, he’d taken the job at the NCB (and a life peerage) from Harold Macmillan’s Conservative government in 1961. 

    Three years after Aberfan, the Wilson government put Robens in charge of a committee on workplace safety – a decision described by Professor Iain McLean, an expert on the disaster, as “beyond satire”. However, the committee was a notable success: it led to the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, enshrining a general duty to ensure the safety of both staff and the public.

     
     

    Spirit of the Age

    Hipsters once went full beard, but a new generation of young men is embracing something more “refined”, says The Guardian – a version of the pencil moustache. Barbers say the ’taches, similar to those sported in the 1940s by the likes of David Niven and Clark Gable, are easy to manage and “attainable”.

     
     
    VIEWPOINT

    Becoming a ghoul

    “A friend confesses at dinner she watched the video of poor William Chapman being mauled to death by a tiger, and on the bus home I watch it too. Then I despise what social media has made me: a rubber-necking ghoul, no better than those who gathered at gibbets and gallows. For the last century or so we’ve been shielded from real atrocities. Now, the first instinct of bystanders at the Yorkshire Wildlife Park was to lift their iPhones. What will the tiger do, how will it kill, will the man fight back? It is morbidly fascinating, which is why we click. But how do we keep our humanity if we can watch the worst things imaginable on the top of a 68 bus?” 

    Janice Turner in The Times

     
     
    talking point

    Public speaking: the case for teaching oracy

    How many times, since leaving school, have you needed to know what an oxbow lake is, asked Daniel Hannan in The Telegraph. “When did you last write out the periodic table, or conjugate a Latin verb?” I bet, though, that you have had to make speeches: “presentations at work, suitable words at birthdays, pep talks to a team”. It’s odd, then, that you were almost certainly never taught public speaking in the way you were taught geography or maths. 

    Lucy Powell, the new education secretary, now wants to give “oracy”, to use the “ugly” 1960s term, “the same status as reading and writing” in England. Traditionalists don’t like the plan – but they ought to. For centuries, rhetoric was a central part of classical education. Computers and AI have made much of the knowledge in the curriculum less important than it was. More useful now is knowing how to sift through information, to present arguments, to engage people, to disagree constructively. “Oracy, if we must call it that, does these things.” 

    Traditional British education certainly has an “aversion to the spoken word”, said Simon Jenkins in The Guardian. Worse still, today “speaking itself is going out of fashion”. Technology is distancing young people from adults and from each other. Studies suggest that in the past two decades, the number of words people say each day has shrunk by nearly a third. A quarter of young people “never even answer the phone unless pre-arranged”. Powell’s plan to teach children “to use the spoken word to their advantage” is long overdue. 

    Andy Burnham’s government seems determined to “rethink” education policy, said The Times. The danger is that the “positive strides that have been made over the past decade” will be undone. From 2010, Michael Gove fought an all-out war against many in the profession to push a traditional, knowledge-rich curriculum. The results have been very impressive. According to the OECD’s Pisa rankings, England now ranks in the world’s top 10 for reading, maths and science – while Scotland and Wales have seen their performance drop significantly. 

    It’s true, though, that oracy has been overlooked, said Kristina Murkett in The Spectator. For GCSE English language, there is one box-ticking exercise called the “Spoken Language Endorsement”, based on a single presentation. In other humanities, there is no oracy element at all. The danger is that the oracy drive could lead in a dumbed-down direction – away from deep knowledge and longer texts. It’s also unclear how it would be assessed. Powell will have to iron out these issues if oracy is to be more than just another “pedagogical buzzword”.

     
     

    It wasn’t all bad

    A tiny, critically endangered frog has been bred in captivity for the first time. Afia Birago’s puddle frogs are one of the world’s smallest amphibians: even as adults, they weigh just 1.75g; as froglets they are no bigger than the tip of a pencil. The remaining wild population survives in two pools in the Atewa Hills Forest Reserve in Ghana, which is under threat from mining operations. So last year, 20 adult frogs were taken to London Zoo for an emergency breeding programme. Now, 15 frogs have hatched. The hope is that conservationists in Ghana will be able to replicate this success, with a view to establishing a sustainable population there.

     
     
    People

    Karl Bushby

    In 1998, Karl Bushby took on an extraordinary challenge, says Simon Hattenstone in The Guardian: divorced, anxious and filled with wanderlust after leaving the Army, he set out to walk (and occasionally swim) across the world. He thought it would take 12 years. In the end, it took 28, during which time he covered 36,000 miles from Chile, up through the Americas, then across Siberia, Asia and Europe. 

    He finally arrived back in England this month, having swum the Channel. Along the way, he’d almost starved on the Patagonian Steppe, been held up at gunpoint in the notorious Darién Gap, and was convicted of spying in Russia. He’d also broken several records, including by being part of the first team in modern history to cross (mainly on foot, but with some swimming) the frozen 51-mile Bering Strait, from Alaska to Russia. 

    He was a lean 29-year-old when he left; he returned as a stocky 57-year-old. People are surprised about his weight, he says, given the walking. “But most of the time [I was] eating out of gas stations, burger bars, sitting somewhere for three months waiting for a visa, getting older…” 

    His trip, he says, has left him with an enormous faith in humanity: the vast majority of people he met were “incredible”. So might he set out again, for another walk? “No!” For him, the project was never about the walking. He doesn’t even like walking. “It’s boring as hell,” he laughs. “It’s really, really tedious.”

     
     

    Image credits, from top: Stephen P. Kelly / Getty Images; Christopher Furlong / Getty Images; Ian Forsyth / Getty Images; Resul Rehimov / Anadolu / Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      Is the internet on the verge of collapse?

    • Morning Report

      Government tells Britons to stockpile food and water

    • Evening Review

      The furore over the ‘Palestine poppy’

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week UK is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.