The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jzblygzdxr1769609154.gif

SUBSCRIBE

Try 6 weeks free

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week’s Saturday Wrap
    A Times writer strikes a nerve, the dangers of kratom, and why Trump rolled out the red carpet for Xi Jinping

     
    controversy of the week

    Education: Did a New York Times writer ‘betray’ her child?

    Nikole Hannah-Jones’ school experiment reads like “an Aesop’s fable for progressives,” said Coleman Hughes in The Free Press. Ten years ago, the New York Times journalist wrote a viral essay explaining why she’d enrolled her 6-year-old daughter, Najya, in an underperforming, majority-Black public school. Better public schools were available near her Brooklyn home, and she and her husband could afford to go private. But Hannah-Jones—best known as creator of the Times’ “1619 Project”—felt an “obligation to be part of the struggle” against racial and class stratification, and believed that her daughter’s presence would help improve the failing school. Ten years on, Hannah-Jones has written a viral follow-up, headlined “In Fighting for Every Black Child, Did I Betray My Own?” Far from lifting up the school, we discover, Najya was “dragged down” by it. Hannah-Jones recounts how assignments went ungraded and disruptive students monopolized the attention of teachers—on the rare occasions those teachers weren’t absent. At Najya’s middle school, there was “no homework whatsoever.” When Najya eventually chose and tested into a majority white and Asian high school, she was woefully unprepared. Now 16, Najya feels cheated by her mother’s choices. “Sometimes I wish instead of always thinking about other kids,” she told Nikole, “you would have thought about me.” 

    Hannah-Jones should feel no guilt, said Jenice Armstrong in The Philadelphia Inquirer. Unlike most of us, she found the courage to “practice her principles,” but faced the same “no-win choice” as many “socially conscious Black parents.” Do we send our kids to neighborhood schools, struggling after decades of “systemic” neglect? Or do we pull strings and write checks to access schools in whiter, more affluent zip codes, condemning our kids to “social isolation and subtle discrimination?” Najya is now getting A’s and B’s, Hannah-Jones writes, but in classrooms where kids toss around “racial slurs as if it were cool.” 

    Those trade-offs are real and agonizing, said Elizabeth Grace Matthew in USA Today. But Hannah-Jones is “evading the truth” about why her daughter’s schools were so bad. She handwaves at “racism” and “segregation” in progressive New York City, and at funding disparities between heavily white and nonwhite districts. But the worst of Najya’s schools spends $52,349 a student annually, far above the national average. Not mentioned by Hannah-Jones are the teachers’ unions that have built a system where their members can “do nothing and get paid.” Neither are the progressive “education professors” who decided tests, discipline, and academic rigor were all oppressive structures to be dismantled. Hannah-Jones helped promote this “faux-enlightened ideology,” even as her own daughter suffered its ravages. 

    Let’s not overdramatize, said Noah Smith in his Substack newsletter. Judging by international test results, Americans are getting “pretty good value” from the money we spend on public education. If we want better value still, we should abandon our “obsession with shrinking class sizes” through hiring more teachers, and start paying higher salaries to better teachers who can make “a big difference in disadvantaged kids’ lives.” With the right policies, all our children can receive a high-quality education in classrooms filled with kids of all backgrounds, said Jill Filipovic in Slate. But we won’t get there if progressives demand “individual parents make intolerable sacrifices that set back the people they love most,” or if they insist “the only way to even the scales is by setting both sides to zero.” 

     
     
    VIEWPOINT

    Special treatment

    “Americans currently suffer under tariffs, obscenely inflated gas prices, and inexplicable trade wars against our geographic neighbors, while Xi Jinping gets a personal tour of Trump’s unfinished vanity ballroom and his personal insult wall of former presidents. Meanwhile, Trump’s close-held allies grotesquely fatten and enrich themselves, feeding upon an open economic wound that looks as if Trump tore it open on purpose, to give himself and his chosen people a chance to feed upon America’s gushing bloodline. We’re testing the far outer bounds of human decency in this administration now, as if daring the public to see how much they can take.” 

    Jeffrey Blehar in National Review

     
     
    briefing

    A dangerous legal high

    Is kratom, an addictive opioid-like drug, getting preferential treatment from the Trump administration?

    What is kratom? 
    Derived from the leaves of the kratom tree, the legal high is sold in convenience stores, smoke shops, and service stations across the U.S. with the pitch that it can ease pain and boost energy. As use has increased—some 5 million Americans have tried kratom, turning the drug into a billion-dollar industry—so have its harms. More than 5,200 people fatally overdosed on kratom between 2020 and 2024, according to the CDC, and kratom-related hospitalizations and poisonings have rocketed nearly 1,300% over the past decade, with nearly 3,500 people severely sickened last year. Authorities found packages of the drug while investigating the mysterious deaths of two University of Mississippi undergrads, ages 18 and 20, in separate incidents last week. Responding to growing concern, the Drug Enforcement Administration this summer temporarily classified three kratom derivatives as federally illegal Schedule 1 substances, a category that includes heroin and LSD. But the Department of Health and Human Services emphasized the change was “not intended to regulate natural leaf kratom,” only synthetics and concentrates of its psychoactive compounds. Many experts call that insufficient—and suggest ties between Trump Cabinet members and kratom firms could be influencing regulations. “It’s looking like we have a coin-operated drug policy,” said former White House adviser Dr. Kevin Sabet. 

    What effect does kratom have on users? 
    Low doses have a stimulant effect; people in Southeast Asia, where the tree is native, have for centuries chewed leaves as a pick-me-up. But in higher doses, kratom acts as a narcotic, because two psychoactive compounds—mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH)—bind to the same receptors as opioids. “If you take two pills it’s like a cup of coffee,” podcaster Joe Rogan said in 2019. “I took eight and I was f---ed up.” Kratom leaves are typically imported from Indonesia and processed stateside into capsules, gummies, and other products. While natural kratom contains only trace amounts of 7-OH, some companies sell concentrated or synthetic forms of the compound under brand names such as Magic 7OH and 7 O’Heaven for as little as $4 a pop. Those concentrates can be up to 13 times stronger than morphine, and users risk addiction, liver damage, and seizures—or worse. Weston Walker, a health-conscious Florida attorney, collapsed and died in 2021 after taking a lethal amount of kratom extract. “You just never imagine your 37-year-old, healthy-as-a-horse brother is going to pass away,” said his sister, Whitney Briggs. 

    Why do people take the drug? 
    Many take it purely recreationally, enjoying a mild alcohol-free buzz from the kratom-infused drinks and cocktails served at hundreds of kratom lounges and bars across the U.S. Some long-haul truckers use it to stay awake on the road. But kratom’s most vocal defenders say it helps them manage pain and chronic conditions, and a Johns Hopkins survey last year found that over a quarter of kratom users take it as an opioid replacement. But while some users say it helped wean them off opioids, others find themselves trading one addiction for another. “Anyone who says kratom is not addictive has never tried it,” a former opioid and kratom user named Jack told Aeon. “I probably spent over $120 a day on kratom, way more than I had spent on oxies.” 

    How has the government responded? 
    A 2016 attempt at banning kratom’s main compounds failed after intense pushback from the American Kratom Association and other lobbying groups. The DEA’s order this summer on three kratom derivatives also bans substances that contain more than 0.05% of 7-OH, a level that excludes raw kratom leaves. But Brandeis University opioid researcher Dr. Andrew Kolodny notes that the majority of patients he has treated for 7-OH addiction started with natural kratom, and that there’s no clear line marking one form as dangerous and the other safe. “The DEA should control kratom in all its forms,” he said. 

    Why hasn’t it? 
    Some experts point to financial links between Trump Cabinet officials and the kratom industry. In 2023, the Justice Department sued one of the country’s largest kratom firms, Oklahoma-based Botanic Tonics, alleging its kratom-infused Feel Free drink was an unsafe “new dietary ingredient.” The DOJ dropped the case last December, saying it was not “a prudent use of government resources,” and over the following months, Botanic Tonics donated $1 million to MAHA PAC, which is associated with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and $443,000 to the Republican National Committee. Asked about the donation, Kennedy said, “I don’t make decisions for the Justice Department.” Markwayne Mullin, the former Oklahoma senator who in March became Homeland Security secretary, has invested up to $1 million in Botanic Tonics. The New York Times reported that Mullin has asked the FDA to soften its warnings on kratom while publicly promoting bans on 7-OH, whose makers compete with Botanic Tonics’ “natural” products. The Department of Homeland Security said Mullin “follows all ethics and conflict-of-interest standards.” 

    Can states take action? 
    Over a dozen have enacted bans on kratom, 7-OH, or both, though enforcement is spotty. Not all experts support blanket prohibition: Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Kirsten Smith warns that a “moral panic freakout” could stifle research into whether kratom can indeed offer an off-ramp from opiates. But most agree kratom companies should not be left to self-regulate. Many in the industry, meanwhile, dismiss health harms from their product. Mac Haddow of the American Kratom Association has applauded the DEA’s 7-OH ban but has also blamed irresponsible consumers for any deaths caused by natural kratom use. “Can we regulate stupid?” he asked. “I can’t do that—no one can.”

     
     

    Only in America

    Stanford University has admitted to using AI to “race swap” a student’s photo in promotional materials. Senior Billy Ramirez, who is Latino, says he initially found it “hilarious” that he’d been replaced by an AI-generated Black woman in the photo of three smiling Stanford undergrads. Later, though, Ramirez said he came to feel “silenced and erased.” Stanford says both “the alteration and lack of disclosure” violated the university’s policy on AI images.

     
     

    It wasn’t all bad

    A Los Angeles content creator has built a large following as the “Squirrel Whisperer” for his tender animal caregiving. Four years ago, Derrick Downey Jr. encountered a pair of squirrels in his neighborhood while taking walks to relieve a severe bout of depression. Naming them “Richard” and “Maxine,” Downey filmed their playful antics and shared it on Instagram, where the post went viral. He has since built a house for them in his yard—a “dine-n’-dash” he calls it—and bestowed names like Niblet and Raggedy Rufus on other furry neighbors. Recently, Downey noticed that Maxine was having an issue with her teeth, which were hurting, and took her to an animal hospital. “We have moments,” Downey said, “and then they go about their squirrel business, and I go about mine.”

     
     
    talking points

    Trump: A very warm welcome for China’s Xi

    President Trump “has accused China of hacking America’s elections and plundering its wealth,” said Peter Nicholas in NBCNews.com. But that didn’t stop him from showering Xi Jinping with “tributes and affection” during the Chinese president’s state visit last week. Trump personally greeted Xi on a 100-foot-long red carpet at Joint Base Andrews—the first time a U.S. president has met a foreign leader there since 1962. Xi “looks strong, vibrant, and fit,” Trump posted online. “Madam Xi, of course, BEAUTIFUL!” Over the next three days, Xi was treated to military flyovers, a tour of Trump’s new, all-stone White House helipad—Xi “loves good granite,” Trump explained—and a state dinner stuffed with tech billionaire attendees such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, SpaceX boss Elon Musk, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. “Pomp prevailed over progress,” said Amy Hawkins in The Guardian. Trump and Xi made no breakthroughs on AI safety, the wars in Iran and Ukraine, or other “thorny issues.” But they did agree to extend their trade truce by two months, and Xi promised to send two giant pandas to Zoo Atlanta. 

    Toasting Xi at the state dinner, Trump claimed the U.S. and China have “never gotten along better,” said Jim Geraghty in National Review. He couldn’t be more wrong. The Chinese Communist Party is threatening and “undermining American interests on every front possible.” Xi’s regime is shipping arms and military supplies to Iran in defiance of U.S. sanctions and, according to American officials, provided Tehran with satellite images of an American base in Jordan “before an attack that killed three U.S. troops in July.” In recent months, China has also stolen F-35 stealth aircraft parts, presumably to help improve its own jets, and hacked numerous federal agencies. Yet Trump believes the U.S. and China are such great pals that he reportedly asked Xi “if he wanted to buy any American weapons.” 

    If only Trump treated our Pacific allies so well, said Jonathan Fritz in MS.now. There were no “bells or whistles” for Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi when she visited the U.S. last week. And Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te hasn’t even been “allowed passage through” the U.S. since Trump returned to office. Unlike those democratically elected leaders, Xi is what Trump wants to be: an authoritarian, said Noah Berlatsky in Public Notice. So when Trump lauds Xi, “he feels like he’s praising himself.” Presidential diplomacy is supposed to advance U.S. interests. But for Trump, it’s about “standing on the world stage and feeling important,” regardless of whether the boots he’s licking are “kicking him and his country in the face.”

     
     
    people

    Burr’s anger management

    Bill Burr is done being the angry guy, said David Fear in Rolling Stone. The comedian has built a huge fan base by venting his spleen onstage and on his podcast, raging against everything from self-checkout machines to the entire city of Philadelphia. But that trademark fury “was always embarrassing to me,” says Burr, 58, “because it reminded me of my dad, who had no control. So I always felt shame. That would make me hate myself, which made me go darker, which made me get angrier.” In his early 50s, Burr took psychedelic mushrooms in a therapeutic attempt to wrestle with those demons. The trip left him overcome with sadness, which was a new feeling for the comedian. “I had basically three emotions. I navigated my life with laughing, being angry, or not giving a f---. Everything else I just had in a vault.” For the next six weeks, “I didn’t do anything. I just wanted to work on myself.” Until then, he’d heeded warnings that letting go of his anger would make him lose his edge. “In comedy, there’s this big thing of ‘Don’t get happy, you’re not going to be funny!’ And it’s the exact opposite.” He still blows up sometimes, but on a scale of 1 to 10, he’s stopped “coming in at an 8 because someone got my dinner order wrong.”

     
     

    Saturday Wrap was written and edited by Theunis Bates, Bill Falk, Bruno Maddox, and Rebecca Nathanson, Tim O’Donnell, and Hallie Stiller.

    Image credits, from top:  Getty; Reuters; AP; Getty
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      Energy bills: what can the government actually do?

    • Morning Report

      Arrest of British-Iranian national over RAF base plot

    • Evening Review

      Diesel crisis: is the UK running out of road?

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week UK is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.