Too fat to breed?
The controversial dating site BeautifulPeople.com launches a "fertility introduction service" for those who want sperm and eggs from its slender members
The dating site BeautifulPeople.com generated buzz this January by deleting the accounts of 5,000 people the website's other members judged too fat to date. Now the Danish service is back in the headlines thanks to its new virtual sperm and egg bank, designed to link would-be parents — hot and homely alike — with good-looking sperm and egg donors registered with the site. Is there anything wrong with screening donors in the hopes of ensuring attractive offspring? (Watch a Fox report about the "fertility forum")
This new service is even creepier than the site itself: There is certainly value in helping infertile couples and single women have children, says Brenna Ehrlich in Mashable. And it's awfully generous of BeautifulPeople.com to offer people who aren't "hotties" themselves access to its smoking gene pool, but "this whole venture is wandering toward the realm of eugenics — if not prancing right into it."
"Dating site launches online sperm and egg bank for 'beautiful people'"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Humans already screen by looks: "This is what mating is all about," says Shawn Alff at Creative Loafing. Whether in the real world or online, humans choose procreation partners based, to some degree, on how they look. This online service merely tightens the equation by focusing entirely on physical appearance. But buyer beware — these days, what you see may be good plastic surgery, not natural beauty.
"BeautifulPeople.com starts its own online sperm and egg bank"
"Superficial" people aren't attractive, anyway: "A lot of people may find this idea offensive," says Sandy Maple at Babble's Strollerderby. "I can't manage to work up any outrage over it." It's laughably "preposterous" to suggest that there's anything superior about "the genetic material one might cull" from people superficial enough to join this website. Remember, "shallow is never attractive."
"Fertility service for beautiful people"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'A speaker courageous enough to stand up to the extremists in his own party'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 18, 2024
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - impeachment Peanuts, record-breaking temperatures, and more
By The Week US Published