The Trump labyrinth
Oh, what a tangled web he weaves ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b20d/1b20d9f221eb7ab5005b02a347b0d52122178061" alt="The president's labyrinth."
President Trump's legal difficulties are a maze. It's so complex that I doubt there is a single person alive who could deliver an accurate and comprehensive two-sentence summary of the relevant twists and turns from January 2017 onward.
High-minded bores are in the habit of telling us that to be informed citizens who participate in a democracy one must absorb the contents of history's "Great Books." But it is hard to see how The Federalist Papers or Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative are any use here. The only books that are going to help you make sense of the headlines are spy thrillers, detective novels, and the comedies of P.G. Wodehouse.
This is especially the case with the latest sidestory involving Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels, a ludicrous black comedy stuffed inside an impossibly complicated post-Cold War international saga of corruption and deceit —The Tailor of Panama by way of Ronald Firbank.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Even getting a handle on the characters is difficult. Cohen is supposed to be the president's attorney. This is, strictly speaking, true, at least in the sense that he appears to be the holder of a law degree. Most of us go through life without requiring the service of lawyers on more than a handful of occasions. Trump has one on quasi-permanent retainer whose job seems to consist solely of making rude phone calls and dispensing six-figure sums to pornographic actresses on the president's behalf without even bothering to consult the man — or, if you believe Rudy Giuliani's hilarious (and kind-of sort-of walked-back) interventions, with his approval in the full expectation of reimbursement.
But Cohen is also a phenomenally wealthy man in his own right, a real estate mogul worth around $100 million. His latest sideline appears to be fleecing morons at corporations willing to pay absurd sums for what could loosely be described as "advice" concerning the president. AT&T alone gave him around $600,000 last year for what it referred to, inimitably, as "actual work." Is that adjective meant to be reassuring? The nearly $2 million he earned from giving potted seminars on Trumpism all went — where else? — to the same Delaware-based shell corporation that paid Stormy Daniels in October 2016. This is very much in keeping with his previous business relationship with Trump. In the past Cohen's modus operandi has been piggybacking on the (presumed) wealth and reputation of his patron. The labyrinthine details of his partnerships with Trump, and their endless intersections with Russian and Ukrainian and mafia characters, could fill several dizzying volumes.
The question is what all this means and where it's going. It all gets very confusing, especially when the plot unfolds in the language of "ties" and "links" and vague appellations like "the Kremlin" or "Moscow," as if a building or a city were a person. It is easy to attach too much significance to some of these relationships. In a globalized economy everyone from Bill and Hillary Clinton to Jay-Z and Beyoncé have significant "ties" to Russian business interests. Russia is an oligarchy; anyone who has made money there in the post-Soviet era has done so thanks to his bribe-enhanced connections with the government. This is equally true in the United States, though for mysterious reasons we tend not to have a problem with this arrangement.
Like any good thriller writer, the Author of History likes to keep His readers guessing. It looks increasingly likely that the chapters about Robert Mueller's open-ended special counsel investigation into possible collusion between Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government were a series of red herrings. One year on the special prosecutor has turned up nothing but a handful of meaningless guilty pleas from people charged with jumbling their facts or lying about insignificant encounters.
Meanwhile, Cohen's payments to Stormy Daniels and his subsequent shakedowns of various Fortune 500 companies — our knowledge of which we owe, naturally, to the latter's attorney — seem more and more like some kind of denouement, one that involves a very obvious violation of federal campaign finance law. Cohen is almost certainly going to be prosecuted, whatever Giuliani says about the irrelevance of Trump's adulteries to American voters, but it is also possible that Trump himself could be implicated.
"Toady and boss get their comeuppance from cunning woman" is a thoroughly satisfying conclusion. It's also very easy to summarize.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Matthew Walther is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has also appeared in First Things, The Spectator of London, The Catholic Herald, National Review, and other publications. He is currently writing a biography of the Rev. Montague Summers. He is also a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow.
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis world
In the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: February 22, 2025
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: February 22, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published