Starmer orders review into leaked anti-Semitism report
Labour leader faces biggest test to date over dossier's ‘incendiary’ claims

Keir Starmer has ordered a review into a leaked internal report of the party’s handing of anti-Semitism claims.
Sky News says the leaking “has sent shockwaves through the party,” while the Evening Standard says the issue is Starmer’s “first test” as leader.
Under mounting pressure to act, Starmer said that an independent investigation would examine the leaking of the 860-page document, as well as its contents including the “wider culture and practices” it refers to and the “background and circumstances in which the report was commissioned and the process involved”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
The dossier, which includes 10,000 separate emails and thousands of private WhatsApp communications, is a draft drawn up to help inform the party’s responses to an investigation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.
It concluded that “factional hostility” to Starmer’s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn, hampered efforts to deal with allegations of antisemitism in the Labour party.
The report says there was an “abundant evidence of a hyper-factional atmosphere prevailing in party HQ… which appears to have affected the expeditious and resolute handling of disciplinary complaints”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It claimed to have found “no evidence” of anti-Semitism complaints being treated differently to other forms of complaint, or of current or former staff being “motivated by anti-Semitic intent”.
However, writes the BBC’s political correspondent Helen Catt, another claim in the report makes the matter even more explosive.
At the 2017 general election, the report says, “some key staff even appeared to work against the party's core objective of winning elections”.
“It’s the allegation that Labour staff worked against a win for Mr Corbyn in the 2017 election that is likely to be most incendiary, if proven,” says Catt.
Richard Burgon, who was shadow justice secretary under Corbyn, said the revelations had prompted many party members to consider leaving.
-
Your Party: a Pythonesque shambles
Talking Point Comical disagreements within Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's group highlight their precarious position
-
Behind the ‘Boriswave’: Farage plans to scrap indefinite leave to remain
The Explainer The problem of the post-Brexit immigration surge – and Reform’s radical solution
-
Can the Lib Dems be a party of government again?
Today's Big Question Leader Ed Davey is urged to drop the stunts and present a serious plan for the country
-
What is Donald Trump’s visit worth to the UK economy?
In the Spotlight Centrepiece of the president’s trip, business-wise, is a ‘technology partnership’
-
Is Andy Burnham making a bid to replace Keir Starmer?
Today's Big Question Mayor of Manchester on manoeuvres but faces a number of obstacles before he can even run
-
Angela Rayner: the rise and fall of a Labour stalwart
In the Spotlight Deputy prime minister resigned after she underpaid £40,000 in stamp duty
-
Will Donald Trump’s second state visit be a diplomatic disaster?
Today's Big Question Charlie Kirk shooting, Saturday’s far-right rally and continued Jeffrey Epstein fallout ramps-up risks of already fraught trip
-
The runners and riders for the Labour deputy leadership
The Explainer Race to replace Angela Rayner likely to come down to Starmer loyalist vs. soft-left MP supported by backbenchers and unions