Turing law: Thousands of gay men to be posthumously pardoned
New plan will clear those convicted of crimes since abolished, but does not go far enough, says campaigners
Thousands of gay and bisexual men convicted of abolished sexual offences are to receive posthumous pardons, the government has announced.
The "hugely important" move will see those convicted for consensual same-sex relationships formally pardoned, reports the Daily Telegraph.
It honours a government commitment made after World War II codebreaker Alan Turing was pardoned in 2013 over a 1952 conviction for gross indecency with a 19-year-old man.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Under the move, which has been dubbed the "Turing law", deceased people who were convicted of sexual acts that are no longer deemed criminal will receive an automatic pardon, while those still living will have the opportunity to have their names cleared through the disregard process, which removes any mention of an offence from criminal record checks.
Justice minister Sam Gyimah said the government would implement the change through an amendment to the policing and crime bill.
"It is hugely important that we pardon people convicted of historical sexual offences who would be innocent of any crime today. Through pardons and the existing disregard process we will meet our manifesto commitment to put right these wrongs," he said.
However, he added, the government would not be supporting a separate private member's bill calling for a "blanket pardon" to be given without need for the disregard process.
"A blanket pardon, without the detailed investigations carried out by the Home Office under the disregard process, could see people guilty of an offence which is still a crime today claiming to be pardoned," said Gyimah.
"This would cause an extraordinary and unnecessary amount of distress to victims and for this reason the government cannot support the private member's bill. Our way forward will be both faster and fairer."
Paul Twocock, from Stonewall, which campaigns for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, told The Guardian the charity welcomed the announcement but disagreed with the government's interpretation of the private member's bill.
He said: "It explicitly excludes pardoning anyone convicted of offences that would still be illegal today, including non-consensual sex and sex with someone under 16."
Nor does the move go far enough for some of those convicted in the past. George Montague, who was found guilty of gross indecency with a man in 1974, told BBC Newsnight he wanted an apology, not a pardon.
He said: "To accept a pardon means you accept that you were guilty. I was not guilty of anything. I was only guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time."
The Lib Dem peer behind the private member's bill that was instrumental in securing the pardon for Mr Turing said he could understand why some people may not want a pardon, or may "feel that it's wrong".
But, Lord Sharkey told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "A pardon is probably the best way of acknowledging the real harm done by the unjust and cruel homophobic laws, which thankfully we've now repealed, and I do hope that a lot of people will feel exactly the same way."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Quiz of The Week: 16 - 22 November
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By The Week Staff Published
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures Firing shells, burning ballots, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
Damian Barr shares his favourite books
The Week Recommends The writer and broadcaster picks works by Alice Walker, Elif Shafak and others
By The Week UK Published
-
Texas’s abortion law: the Republicans get their way, at last
Speed Read SB8 authorises private citizens to sue anyone who performs, ‘aids or abets’ an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy
By The Week Staff Published
-
Changing legal gender: what’s new and how does it work?
Speed Read Cost of a gender recognition certificate application is reduced from £140 to £5
By Kate Samuelson Last updated
-
America’s bloodiest state votes to ban the death penalty
Speed Read Virginia has executed more than 1,300 people in its 400-year history
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
FBI accused of ‘fake’ background check on Donald Trump Supreme Court nominee
Speed Read Democratic senator calls for ‘proper oversight’ over Brett Kavanaugh investigation into sexual assault claims
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Family of Malcolm X claims letter proves FBI and NYPD involved in his murder
Speed Read Daughters of assassinated civil rights leader demand reopening of investigation
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Meghan Markle granted nine-month delay in Mail on Sunday privacy case
Speed Read Duchess of Sussex had applied for summary judgement in battle over letters sent to her estranged father
By Chas Newkey-Burden Last updated
-
Meghan Markle to pay £67,000 after losing first round of legal battle against Mail
Speed Read Duchess of Sussex is suing the newspaper’s publisher for printing parts of private letter to her father
By Joe Evans Published
-
MI6 agents tried to stop judge seeing secret documents in ‘licence to kill’ case
Speed Read Intelligence agency was forced to apologise for ‘any misunderstanding’, court documents show
By Joe Evans Published