Why the government's snooping is here to stay
Despite all the headlines, a new poll shows Americans are fine with the government spying on them
President Obama and his administration have faced tough questions over the past week, following the publication of leaked classified information that exposed new details about the scope and size of controversial intelligence-gathering practices carried out by the National Security Agency and the FBI.
Yet despite those revelations, a Washington Post-Pew Research Center poll released Monday suggested that the White House has little reason to fear a public backlash: A comfortable majority of Americans approves of the government's spying efforts. Furthermore, the survey indicated that public opinion on the issue has remained virtually unchanged over the years, even as new details about those efforts have emerged.
According to the poll, 56 percent of respondents said the NSA's tracking of millions of Americans' phone records was an "acceptable" way for the government to monitor terrorism, versus 41 percent who said it was not. Meanwhile, nearly two-thirds of respondents said it was more important for the government to investigate terrorism than to refrain from violating Americans' personal privacy.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Strikingly, that split was almost identical to what Pew found in 2010 and in 2006 — shortly after President George W. Bush's use of warrantless wiretaps became public.
That, Pew concluded, left "no indications that last week's revelations of the government's collection of phone records and internet data have altered fundamental public views about the tradeoff between investigating possible terrorism and protecting personal privacy."
While the overall percentages that supported or opposed such surveillance remained unchanged since 2006, the partisan makeup of those camps did. In 2006, 75 percent of Republicans approved of the NSA's actions, compared to just 37 percent of Democrats. In the latest survey, 52 percent of Republicans said the NSA's phone-tracking was acceptable, as did 64 percent of Democrats.
"Partisan hypocrisy, it would seem, infects members of both parties," said Juliet Lapidos at The New York Times. However, Lapidos also noted that Congress introduced new judicial safeguards after Bush's warrantless program was revealed, possibly setting Democrats' minds at ease.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Most strikingly, the poll found that respondents were closely split over whether the government should go even further to police terrorism than it currently does. While a slim 52 percent majority said the government should not be able to monitor everyone's emails, 45 percent said the government should have that authority.
Within the government, there is a near-universal consensus that the intelligence operations in question are legal and necessary. Even Republicans, who have taken every opportunity to keep a slew of White House scandals in the news, have lined up behind Obama on the issue.
What that all suggests is that there's practically no political pressure, either from inside the government or from the public, for the White House to curb its counterterrorism efforts and order the NSA to rein in its surveillance.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
-
How to find cheaper car insurance as premiums accelerate
The Explainer Car insurance costs are rising but there are ways to put the brakes on price rises
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
What to know when planning an awe-inspiring hike on the Inca Trail
The Week Recommends Peru's most famous trail leads to Machu Picchu
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Lead poisoning remains a threat
The Explainer The toxin is built into our lives
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published