Finally, we know which country is the most useless
Drum roll, please...
Sure, we can measure objective things like infant mortality rates and alcohol use until our almanacs are bulging. But who's going to have the guts to compile a weirdly arbitrary infographic ranking which countries do the most for the world, and which ones we could really do without? The answer is independent policy advisor Simon Anholt, who has put together the Good Country Index so we can sort out the good world citizens from the countries that need a time out.
The Good Country Index aims to order the globe based not on which countries are the best or healthiest or safest places to live, but which ones contribute the most to the global good. Accordingly, it ranks each nation on its contribution to science and technology, culture, international peace and security, world order, planet and climate, prosperity and equality, and health and wellbeing. You can see how countries rank overall, and how they rate in each separate category, and you can also see the sub-rankings that lead to their overall category score (for instance, "world order" breaks down to charity giving, refugees hosted, refugees generated, population growth, and UN treaties signed). But you may not see the data that Anholt incorporated into his conclusions. Though we are assured that there are 35 datasets, and that they are "reliable."
So this is probably not a good guide for, say, policy decisions. ("Libya, you scored terribly on the Good Country Index! Get off the Earth!") But it could spark some interesting conversations about priorities: Is a nation's contribution to culture really as important as its contribution to prosperity and equality? Should "peacekeeping troops" count toward a country's "peace and security" score? Does it make sense to weight CO2 emissions the same as other greenhouse emissions? Is it fair to rank very poor countries on charitable contributions? (There's an easy answer to that one, actually; for some indicators, the score is proportional to gross domestic product.)
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But okay, some of you don't want to deal in subtleties. You just want to know which nations to praise and which ones to scold. Keep your shirt on: here's your top and bottom 10.
"Good" countries
1. Ireland
2. Finland
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
3. Switzerland
4. Netherlands
5. New Zealand
6. Sweden
8. Norway
9. Denmark
10. Belgium
"Bad" countries
116. Yemen
117. Venezuela
118. Benin
119. Indonesia
120. Zimbabwe
121. Angola
122. Azerbaijan
123. Iraq
124. Vietnam
125. Libya
For more information on how countries shake out in the subcategories and sub-sub-categories, you can spend ages playing around with the rankings here.
This article, by Jess Zimmerman, originally appeared at GlobalPost.
More from Globalpost...
-
Will Starmer's Brexit reset work?
Today's Big Question PM will have to tread a fine line to keep Leavers on side as leaks suggest EU's 'tough red lines' in trade talks next year
By The Week UK Published
-
How domestic abusers are exploiting technology
The Explainer Apps intended for child safety are being used to secretly spy on partners
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists finally know when humans and Neanderthals mixed DNA
Under the radar The two began interbreeding about 47,000 years ago, according to researchers
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published