Exhibit of the week: Gauguin: Metamorphoses

MoMA’s big new show “thrillingly complicates” our understanding of Paul Gauguin.

The Museum of Modern Art, New York City

Through June 8

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Gauguin’s little-known prints turn out to have been “some of the most inventive and daring images” any European artist was making at the time, said Jason Farago in The Guardian (U.K.). He regularly reworked figures across different media, often transforming enticing images from his picture-postcard paintings into “something nocturnal, menacing, or obscene.” An 1892 painting of a nude Tahitian woman picking a flower, The Delightful Land, is followed here by six woodcut versions in which the figure nearly disappears behind a cloud of gray ink or surrenders center stage to a frame of “proto-expressionist” flora. Suddenly, Gauguin’s Polynesia looks less like the imagined paradise of a deluded romantic and more like a place that revealed its fair share of terror and pain.

The women got the worst of it, said Ariella Budick in the Financial Times. Though the curators barely acknowledge the obvious, Gauguin was a pederast and a wife beater, and he openly entertained rape fantasies. The 13-year-old girl he took as a wife appears curled in a fetal position and clearly terrorized in one print series here. Nearby, a monstrous figure in the woodcut Be in Love and You Will Be Happy grabs a naked woman by the arm while a hag-like figure looks on in horror. Gauguin, who “made it his mission to bare the priggish pieties of French society,” may have been trying to reveal his own darkest urges as a way to counter a long tradition in Western art of depicting rape scenes in a way that diminished the violence of the act. If MoMA seems not to take that motive seriously, it’s “only because the museum lacks the artist’s appalling honesty.”