The Supreme Court ruled this week that police can conduct warrantless searches on a property if one of the tenants consents. The 6–3 vote stems from a 2009 Los Angeles case involving robbery suspect Walter Fernandez, who refused to let police inside his home. Noticing that his girlfriend was bloodied and bruised, officers removed Fernandez on suspicion of domestic abuse, and were then let in by his girlfriend. Fernandez’s lawyers argued that their client was protected from the warrantless search under the Fourth Amendment, but justices ruled that when one of the tenants is absent, another one is free to make the decision—even if police are the ones who removed the objecting tenant.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Today's political cartoons - May 1, 2024Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - beware of governor, biting debates, and more
-
Democrats defang GOP speaker ouster threatSpeed Read Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she will force a vote to remove House Speaker Mike Johnson
-
Biden poised to ease marijuana restrictionsSpeed Read The move will reclassify it as a less dangerous drug
