The Supreme Court ruled this week that police can conduct warrantless searches on a property if one of the tenants consents. The 6–3 vote stems from a 2009 Los Angeles case involving robbery suspect Walter Fernandez, who refused to let police inside his home. Noticing that his girlfriend was bloodied and bruised, officers removed Fernandez on suspicion of domestic abuse, and were then let in by his girlfriend. Fernandez’s lawyers argued that their client was protected from the warrantless search under the Fourth Amendment, but justices ruled that when one of the tenants is absent, another one is free to make the decision—even if police are the ones who removed the objecting tenant.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Moon dust has earthly elements thanks to a magnetic bridgeUnder the radar The substances could help supply a lunar base
-
World’s oldest rock art discovered in IndonesiaUnder the Radar Ancient handprint on Sulawesi cave wall suggests complexity of thought, challenging long-held belief that human intelligence erupted in Europe
-
Claude Code: the viral AI coding app making a splash in techThe Explainer Engineers and noncoders alike are helping the app go viral
