Supreme Court frowns on recess appointments

Will the Supreme Court limit the presidential practice of filling high-level posts during Senate recesses?

The Supreme Court this week hinted that it might limit the presidential practice of filling high-level posts during Senate recesses. During oral arguments, justices suggested that President Obama had exceeded constitutional limits when he made three unilateral appointments to the National Labor Relations Board during a brief Senate break in 2012. The White House claims those appointments were a last resort after Republicans blocked qualified nominees for political reasons, but Justice Elena Kagan implied that the practice—which was adopted during the republic’s early days to keep the government running—had been abused by both parties in recent decades. “This is not the horse-and-buggy era anymore,” she said.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us