This is the twistiest tongue twister ever, says science
Not for the easily exasperated
Forget Peter and his peppers, and Sally and her seashells. Researchers at MIT claim they have found the twistiest tongue twister in the English language: "Pad kid poured curd pulled cod."
Presenting the work at the Acoustical Society of America in San Francisco last week, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, an MIT psychologist who helped coin the phrase, says it's so tricky that when she asked subjects to say it ten times fast, some became so tongue-tied that they simply gave up.
This puts it in the league of famously frustrating phrases like "Clean clams crammed in clean cans"; "The top cop saw a cop top"; and "The seething sea ceaseth and thus the seething sea sufficeth us."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So what makes some phrases harder to say than others? Researchers say tongue twisters share certain qualities that the human brain and mouth tend to reject. For example, they often contain a quick string of similar but distinct phonemes, which are the smallest linguistic unit (like "s" or "sh"). Inversions, such as "the top cop saw a cop top," also prove tricky. And "Pad kid poured curd pulled cod" has the extra bonus of being totally nonsensical.
Researchers have also identified the kinds of mistakes people tend to make when attempting these phrases. They often conflate consonants, a mistake linguists refer to as double onsets. "Top cop" sometimes becomes "tkop," for example. People also tend to turn vowels into mush. "Toy boat" very quickly becomes "tuh-boyt."
Is the brain jumbling the syllables, or are the muscles in our mouths unable to handle certain rapid movements? In 1982, researchers Ralph and Lyn Haber examined where the mistakes occur. Asking college-age test subjects to silently read two types of sentences — ones that contained tongue twisters, and ones that were similar in complexity, but did not contain tongue twisters — the Habers found that subjects slowed down on sentences with tongue twisters, even when their actual tongues were not in use. This implied that the brain is confusing the sounds before they ever reach the mouth.
How Stuff Works explains:
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Then earlier this year, another set of researchers from University of California, San Francisco took a closer, more invasive look at the phenomenon. The scientists surgically implanted electrodes under the skulls of three epilepsy patients (a routine procedure), which allowed them to record electrical activity in the brain.
Patients then read from a list of English syllables, while researchers recorded the electrical response in their brains. What they found: The neural patterns that lit up when subjects articulated consonants were quite different from those of vowels, even though the parts of speech "use the exact same parts of the vocal tract," the study's author, Edward Chang, told Nature.
This helps explain why it's easier for the brain to confuse consonants and flip vowels with their own kind. A light tin can easily become a tight lin, for example.
The team also found that the brain seemed to split phonemes into three categories based on which part of the tongue produced them. Nature explains:
Sounds formed in the same part of the mouth are even easier to flip-flop. This means that the neural path that leads to "Sally sells seashells" runs right alongside "Sally sells she sells." Nature:
Still, it's worth a shot. Try saying, "Pad kid poured curd pulled cod" ten times fast. Go.
Carmel Lobello is the business editor at TheWeek.com. Previously, she was an editor at DeathandTaxesMag.com.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published