Today in history: November 7
In 1876, America suffered a very confusing presidential election
Think the 2000 election between Al Gore and George W. Bush was messy? On this day in 1876, an even more controversial election was held, and when it was finally over, the man who got the both the most popular votes AND electoral votes wound up the loser.
So what happened? In addition to snagging 51 percent of the popular vote, Samuel Tilden, the Democratic governor of New York, won 184 electoral votes — one short of winning the White House. His rival, the Republican governor of Ohio, Rutherford B. Hayes, won just 47.9 percent of the vote and 165 electoral votes. Here's the catch: Twenty other electoral votes in several states were disputed and went uncounted. The states: Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon.
In all three southern states, it looked like Tilden won the popular vote. But there were allegations of fraud (ink-smeared ballots and bribery) and voter intimidation that kept, some said, voters away. Chaos ensued. In Florida, for example, the Republicans said they won by 922 votes. Democrats say they did — by 94 votes.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Meantime, in Oregon, both Democrats and Republicans agreed that Hayes won the state. But when the Democratic governor found out one Republican member of the electoral college was a federal worker (a postmaster) employee and ineligible to serve, he replaced him — with a Democrat. The Republican elector promptly resigned his post office job and said that as a private citizen, he would cast his electoral college vote for Hayes.
Wait, there's more. All four states — Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon — submitted two sets of electoral vote counts each to Congress, all with different results. To untangle the mess, Congress set up, in January 1877, an electoral commission: Five members of the House, five members of the Senate, and five Supreme Court justices.
By the way, there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution saying this is how an election standoff was to be resolved. After much maneuvering, the commission voted along party lines — 8 to 7 — to award the disputed electoral votes, and the presidency, to Hayes.
But it still wasn't over. Democrats threatened to filibuster the counting of electoral votes to keep Hayes from winning. In 1877 — just weeks before inauguration day — Democrats gave in, with one big string attached. Republicans must agree, they said, to withdraw all federal troops fro the south — this was just a decade after the civil war. The GOP agreed — and thus the Compromise of 1877.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
November 7, 1944: Franklin Roosevelt was elected president for the fourth time. After his death, the 22nd Amendment was passed, limiting a president's tenure to two terms.
November 7, 1967: President Johnson signed the Public Broadcasting Act, establishing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
November 7, 1973: Congress overrode President Nixon's veto of the War Powers Act, which limits a president's power to wage war without Congressional approval.
Quote of the Day
"He who knows best knows how little he knows." - Thomas Jefferson
More from West Wing Reports....
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published