The Supreme Court has agreed to consider limiting the Environmental Protection Agency’s power to regulate greenhouse gases, potentially hampering the Obama administration’s bid to tackle global warming. The court ruled in 2007 that the Clean Air Act required the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases, but this week accepted petitions brought by energy producers eager to roll back that mandate. “The EPA is seeking to regulate U.S. manufacturing in a way that Congress never planned,” said Harry Ng of the American Petroleum Institute. Climate activists were heartened, however, when the court declined to examine other EPA policies, such as stricter fuel-economy standards for cars.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Trump wants a weaker dollar but economists aren’t so sureTalking Points A weaker dollar can make imports more expensive but also boost gold
-
Political cartoons for February 3Cartoons Tuesday’s political cartoons include empty seats, the worst of the worst of bunnies, and more
-
Trump’s Kennedy Center closure plan draws ireSpeed Read Trump said he will close the center for two years for ‘renovations’
