Book of the week: Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety by Eric Schlosser

The world has come close to nuclear catastrophe many times—often because of the mishandling of American weaponry.

(Penguin, $36)

Eric Schlosser’s latest work is “the most edifying” and “most frightening” book I have read this year, said Matthew Price in Newsday. Deeply researched and masterfully written, this history of nuclear weaponry will wake many readers to the fact that the world has come close to nuclear catastrophe many times—often because of the mishandling of American bombs and warheads. As Schlosser reports, from 1950 to 1968 alone, at least 1,200 nuclear weapons in the nation’s arsenal were involved in accidents. In 1961, for instance, a bomb 250 times more potent than the one dropped on Hiroshima fell from a stricken B-52 near Goldsboro, N.C.—and would have detonated if one fragile switch had failed. “That things did not go boom” seems to owe mostly to “dumb luck.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

But it didn’t explode, did it? said Arthur Herman in The Wall Street Journal. Schlosser wants readers to conclude that nuclear weapons are simply too dangerous to have around, but he’s “too good a reporter and historian” to hide a different truth: No U.S. nuclear weapon yet has accidentally exploded or even leaked radioactive material, and our weapons stockpile has been made safer and more secure decade after decade. “The most dismaying revelations” in the book, unfortunately, are not about near accidents, said Walter Russell Mead in The New York Times. For decades, each Cold War president had only a “rigid and inflexible” strategic plan to work from in the event of a nuclear confrontation. Surely, some of today’s nuclear nations have similar plans, and each can turn a simple misunderstanding into “an inexorable march toward disaster.”