Americans only care about spying when the other party does it

In 2006, Democrats were incensed by the idea of the Bush administration snooping on them in the name of fighting terrorism. When asked whether it was "acceptable" for the NSA to have access to phone records, only 37 percent said yes, according to a Washington Post-Pew Center poll, while Republicans stood behind George W. Bush at 75 percent.

What a difference a president makes. On Tuesday, a poll asking almost the same question found the numbers switched: 64 percent of Democrats approved of the NSA's actions while only 52 percent of Republicans did. Gallup found a similar partisan split:

(Gallup)

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

These poll results seem to indicate that Americans care more about condemning the opposing party than protecting privacy. And considering today's hyper-partisan political landscape, that's easy to believe. Even the White House, which has ardently defended the NSA's surveillance program, seems to have switched sides on the issue since the Bush administration:

Other reasons might exist to explain why some Americans have changed how they feel about the NSA collecting phone records. The outcome of a couple of polls isn't conclusive evidence that partisanship is to blame. Juliet Lapidos of The New York Times noted that 2006 and 2013 are very different eras:

Americans are also split on whether Edward Snowden was right or wrong to leak classified information to The Guardian and The Washington Post, with 49 percent of Republicans supporting his actions compared to only 39 percent of Democrats. One thing members of both parties agree on? That the press was right to publish the information given to them.