Fannie Mae's record profit is good news for taxpayers
The government-backed mortgage firm is starting to return billions of dollars to the Treasury
Government-owned mortgage giant Fannie Mae posted its most profitable year ever in 2012, earning $17.2 billion.
It's a major turnaround for the company, which reported a $16.9 billion loss in 2011 and hadn't seen a full-year profit since 2006. But with the housing market enjoying a resurgence, the company expects to remain profitable going forward. And, in a welcome development for taxpayers, that means Fannie Mae can start paying back the billions of dollars it's received since the government took it over at the height of the financial crisis.
"Solid business fundamentals such as improving performance of our book of business and improvements in the housing market led us to report the largest annual and quarterly net income in the company’s history," Susan McFarland, Fannie's executive vice president and chief financial officer, said in a press release. "We expect to remain profitable for the foreseeable future and return significant value to taxpayers."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The government stepped in to rescue Fannie Mae and sister firm Freddie Mac in 2008, pumping billions of dollars into the two companies in what quickly became one of the most contentious moves of the federal bailout. Fannie was able to return $11.6 billion to the federal government last year, but is still on the hook for an eye-popping $80.4 billion.
It was the first time since the government takeover that Fannie was able to pay back the government without needing to pull additional funds from the Treasury Department. Under the terms of the takeover, Fannie is required to pay quarterly dividends to the government, but at the same time is allowed to draw billions from the Treasury to shore up its finances. In 2011, for example, Fannie paid $9.6 billion to the government, but withdrew $25.6 billion.
Through mid-December, the firm had received about $116 billion in bailout money.
A settlement with Bank of America bolstered Fannie's profits last year, but the major driver of the company's turnaround has been the housing market's recovery. Fannie has now posted positive net earnings for the past five quarters.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
From the Wall Street Journal's Nick Timiraos:
Fannie could soon pay back even more money to the government when it reports its first-quarter earnings next month. As Bloomberg notes, the company could determine it is now financially healthy enough to reverse billions in past write-downs, which would allow it to send an additional $58 billion to the Treasury.
Still, the company has a long way to go to reimburse taxpayers. And what Fannie's sudden profitability means for the company's future is unclear. The government has said it wants to reduce its role in the housing market and potentially sell off the mortgage giant as part of a broader housing finance industry overhaul. But Fannie's newfound profitability may put a damper on Washington's willingness to act.
From CNBC's Eamon Javers:
Lawmakers could see an era of steady profits from Fannie Mae as a signal that the crisis is over, easing pressure to decide whether or not to unwind the government's significant involvement in the nation's housing finance. [CNBC]
Plus, profits from Fannie Mae could be seen as a rare piece of budgetary good news in a capital that's otherwise drowning in debt, which could provide more impetus to freeze the current post-bailout situation in place.
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The Nutcracker: English National Ballet's reboot restores 'festive sparkle'
The Week Recommends Long-overdue revamp of Tchaikovsky's ballet is 'fun, cohesive and astoundingly pretty'
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published