Why we'll never have a real-life Jurassic Park

Bad news, dino fans. New research suggests that DNA decomposes far too fast for us to clone any ancient beasts

Theme park
(Image credit: CC BY: Scott Kinmartin)

Back in April, an eccentric Australian billionaire revealed grandiose plans for a real-life Jurassic Park — replete with cloned dinosaurs — on a remote resort in southern Queensland. Unfortunately for him (and kids everywhere) that dream will probably never become a reality. A new study published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B finds that the DNA required to genetically engineer ancient creatures breaks down at a rate far too fast for dino-dreamin' scientists to effectively use. Here's what you should know:

What exactly did researchers do?

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

How much readable DNA was left?

Sadly, not enough to clone anything. Each bone contained extremely faint traces of the flightless bird's DNA, but the team discovered that DNA has a half-life of just 521 years, and external conditions like temperature, bacteria, and oxygenation typically speed up the decay process. "That means that after 521 years, half the bonds between nucleotides in the backbone of a sample would have broken," says Matt Kaplan at Nature. After another 521 years, all of the bonds would be broken, meaning there isn't enough DNA to clone anything. "Your beautiful Jurassic Park dreams have just been crushed with Jurassic Park III levels of disappointment," says Brian Barret at Gizmodo.

What if the DNA is preserved in amber? Or frozen?

"Absolutely ideal conditions" might help DNA "hang around for several thousand years," says Ian Steadman at Wired. Unfortunately, the last dinosaur died 65 million years ago.

So there's no hope?

The possibility of recreating a dinosaur is looking increasingly grim. In 2009, a few researchers raised the possibility of reverse-engineering one from chicken genes to make the squawky birds more like their ancient ancestors — not exactly the same thing as cloning a giant, fearsome lizard. Perhaps the ultimate lesson of Jurassic Park was right, says Wired's Steadman. "Man and dinosaur were not meant to coexist."

Sources: Gizmodo, Nature, Popular Science (2), Wired

Chris Gayomali is the science and technology editor for TheWeek.com. Previously, he was a tech reporter at TIME. His work has also appeared in Men's Journal, Esquire, and The Atlantic, among other places. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.