Book of the week: The Social Conquest of Earth by Edward O. Wilson

Wilson has had a change of heart and now argues against one of evolutionary theory's main precepts.

(Liveright, $28)

It takes a brave man to admit he’s wrong, said Larry Lebowitz in The Miami Herald. “Hardly a stranger to intellectual dustups,” evolutionary biologist Edward O. Wilson became widely known in the 1970s when two of his books helped popularize the then controversial idea that cooperative social behavior is rooted in the individual’s essentially selfish drive to spread his or her genes. Wilson, now 82, has recently had a change of heart. In this “deftly argued” book, he rejects the now widely accepted view that the drive to promote the survival of family underlies all altruistic behavior. Instead, he says that, like the ants he has spent a lifetime studying, we are “eusocial” beings, hypercooperators who have thrived because of a genetically cultivated ability to put the interests of a group—even one in which family ties are weak—ahead of the interests of self.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Wilson can’t help speculating about what all this portends for humanity’s future, said Natalie Angier in Smithsonian. Convinced that our selfish instincts are older than our altruistic traits, he cultivates a “beautifully appointed” sense of doom about the dangers of wedding “Stone Age emotions” with “Star Wars” technologies. But he’s clearly hoping that our altruistic genes win out—helping us become better stewards of this planet so that we can establish what he calls “a permanent paradise for human beings.” It could be years before we know if Wilson was right to break from the conventional wisdom of his own field, said Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker. But the debate will be interesting to watch. “This is science with existential stakes.”

Explore More