The death of Encyclopaedia Britannica: No big deal?
The leather-bound compendium of all knowledge has struggled to compete with Wikipedia. While some are in mourning, others say good riddance
Encyclopaedia Britannica announced that it is going out of print, ending a 244-year run. Once the world's preeminent font of facts, its gilded volumes attesting to its supremacy, the encyclopedia fell on hard times with the rise of the Internet. Unwieldy and often outdated — the last print edition chronicles 2010 and weighs 129 pounds — Encyclopaedia Britannica could hardly compete with the living, breathing animal that is Wikipedia. But as the print edition goes gently into that good night (it will continue as a digital entity), the nostalgia-prone are treating its passing as particularly tragic. Is it really that sad?
Yes! Those books were special: Sure, Encyclopaedia Britannica died "under its own massive, printed weight," says Cassie Murdoch at Jezebel. In this age of "Wiki everything," we'll "survive just fine without it." But "until they find a way to recreate the experience of holding the weighty tome in one's hand and inhaling the almost ancient smell of Encyclopaedia Britannica through your electronic device, we can still rightly sulk about the death of these classic books."
"Encyclopaedia Britannica dies under its own massive, printed weight"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nah. No one was using it anyway: So, Wikipedia wins. Some will "bemoan this development as the triumph of an often amateurish, sometimes inaccurate, occasionally incomprehensible home-made encyclopedia over a reliable research work crafted by experts," says Harry McCracken at Time. But Encyclopaedia Britannica was "far from perfect." If I had to choose between them, "I'd opt for the more exhaustive, ambitious, accessible, continuously-updated, no-cost Wikipedia in a heartbeat. In fact, I already have." When was the last time anyone used Britannica "in its classic form"?
"No more dead-tree Encyclopaedia Britannica: Sad, but not that sad"
Not to worry. Encyclopaedia Britannica will live on: The end of the print edition is a "momentous event," say the editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, but in a "larger sense this is just another historical data point in the evolution of human knowledge." The encyclopedia will continue on the Internet, "in bigger, more numerous, and more vibrant digital forms." Encyclopedia Britannica is poised "to serve knowledge and learning in new ways that go way beyond reference works." So check out Britannica Online, "which is entirely free" until March 19.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The Nutcracker: English National Ballet's reboot restores 'festive sparkle'
The Week Recommends Long-overdue revamp of Tchaikovsky's ballet is 'fun, cohesive and astoundingly pretty'
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published