Exhibit of the week: Foreclosed: Rehousing the American Dream

MoMA commissioned five architectural firms to propose solutions to the community blight and other challenges faced by suburban towns as a result of the foreclosure crisis.

Museum of Modern Art, New York

Through July 30

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Still, there are plenty of useful ideas here, said Fred A. Bernstein in Architectural​Record.com. One brilliant project, from Chicago architect Jeanne Gang, would repurpose the abandoned factories of Cicero, Ill., by inserting gardens, shops, and modular housing in the buildings’ steel-framed shells. Not only has Gang devised a way that each residence could grow or shrink as family sizes change; the plans look “practically shovel-ready.” Even the Keizer proposal makes good sense upon close inspection. As shown in the model created by the firm WorkAC, the fuel plant would actually sit at the center of the community within “a gorgeous dome-shaped structure.” A viewer can easily imagine a developer seeing the “gently futuristic suburb” that surrounds it and “wanting to break ground tomorrow.”

Good luck with that, said Guy Horton in Archinect.com. There are definitely “some valuable ideas” here, but the proposals skirt so close to science fiction that they make architecture look like a profession that’s simply out of touch with reality. After all, architecture “privileges the heroic,” while America’s suburbs are an expression of many individuals making their own building choices, “house by house, lot by lot.” MoMA tried to keep the work grounded in the possible by forcing each team to collaborate with lawyers, economists, and other specialists, but few actual community members were asked to weigh in. The whole project can be justified as an attempt to get architects to talk among themselves about how they can address the challenges of a new century in a new way. But when the profession loses the public’s trust in the process, that’s “not good for marketing.”