India: It’s easier to move people than tigers
In fact, scientists say the best response to a tiger attack on humans is not to go after the animal, but to move the people, said an editorial at The Hindu.
Editorial
The Hindu
It’s always distressing when someone gets eaten by a tiger, said The Hindu. Villagers in Maharashtra’s Yavatmal district, on the edge of Tipeshwar Wildlife Sanctuary, are understandably upset after a 60-year-old farmer was killed and partially eaten last week by a tigress and her cubs. They want a fence built, or the tigers hunted and killed, or both.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But let’s not overreact. It is important to remember “that man-eating is not a widespread phenomenon.” In fact, there are very few tigers left in India. For so many years, far too many were killed as nuisances or for trophies, and their forest habitat has been fragmented to the point that few areas are large enough to support the wide-ranging predators. Perhaps 1,500 survive today in all of India, and most of them are desperate to avoid encounters with humans.
In fact, scientists say the best response to a tiger attack on humans is not to go after the animal, but to move the people. Relocating these remote villagers would be more effective than anything else in preventing further attacks, and much cheaper than building a fence—even after paying “handsome compensatory packages” to those asked to leave their homes. Staying as far away as possible from one another will benefit both humans and tigers.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Donald Trump's grab for the Panama Canal
The Explainer The US has a big interest in the canal through which 40% of its container traffic passes
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: February 1, 2025
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: February 1, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Malaysia: Hiding something or just incompetent?
feature It is “painful to watch” how Malaysia has embarrassed itself before the world with its bungled response to the missing plane.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Tunisia: The only bloom of the Arab Spring
feature After years of “stormy discussions and intellectual tug-of-war,” Tunisia has emerged as a secular democracy.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Australia: It takes two to reconcile
feature To move beyond Australia’s colonialist past, we Aborigines must forgive.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Israel: Ariel Sharon’s ambiguous legacy
feature Ariel Sharon played a key role at every major crossroads Israel faced in his adult life.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
South Africa: Trying to live up to Mandela
feature That South Africa was prepared for the death of Nelson Mandela is one of his greatest legacies.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
China: Staking a claim to the air and the sea
feature China has declared an air defense identification zone over the East China Sea that includes a set of islands claimed by Japan.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
China: Is our aid to the Philippines too meager?
feature China donated $100,000 to the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, but later increased the amount to $1.6 million.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Philippines: A calamitous response to calamity
feature “Where is the food, where is the water? Where are the military collecting the dead?”
By The Week Staff Last updated