Robert J. Samuelson
The Washington Post
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Conservatives like to pretend that budgets can be balanced if we just cut “wasteful spending”—farm subsidies, Amtrak, community block grants, and subsidies to NPR and cultural organizations—and change the rules on Social Security and Medicare. But eliminating the “discretionary” programs conservatives hate would save less than $100 billion, when total spending last year was $3.5 trillion. If new taxes are off the table, “do conservatives really want to eliminate the national parks? The FBI? Highways?”
The liberal solution—taxing the rich and cutting defense to the bone—is no less delusional. The top 10 percent already pay 55 percent of all federal taxes; besides, adding a “millionaires’ surtax’’ or higher tax rates would not avert the need for major cuts and entitlement reform.
If we are to be serious about the deficit, we’ll have to accept both large, painful spending cuts and substantial tax increases. Any politician or partisan pundit who says differently is lying, and postponing our nation’s day of reckoning.