ROTC: A thaw in the Ivy League
With the end of DADT, will the nation’s military and academic elites reconcile?
After a four-decade absence, will the ROTC finally return to the nation’s elite college campuses? asked Tamar Lewin in The New York Times. The armed forces’ Reserve Officer Training Corps has been barred from many colleges since the days of fiery protests against the Vietnam War. But campuses continued stiff-arming the military long after that war ended, justifying their exclusion of the ROTC in recent years on the grounds that the military discriminated against gays and lesbians. After last month’s repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell’’ policy, however, the presidents of Harvard, Yale, and Columbia all expressed “interest in bringing back the ROTC.” The stage seems set for a rapprochement between the nation’s military and academic elites.
Don’t bet on it, said Kyle Smith in the New York Post. Whether or not the ROTC formally returns to elite universities, academia is deeply hostile to the military. For years, academics and students claimed their disdain was based on “the gay-bashing ways” of the Pentagon. Curiously, “they didn’t notice or care that DADT was a federal law passed by Congress, and none of them banned the president who signed it, Bill Clinton.” Now that DADT is gone, we’ll see no change in the anti-military attitude on these coddled campuses. “Ivy Leaguers are not going to turn down glamour jobs on Wall Street and Hollywood and Silicon Valley in favor of a gig in Fort Dysentery, Afghanistan.’’ Fine—who needs the spoiled brats? said Jed Babbin in The American Spectator online. It’s almost pointless to look for military leaders on campuses where “the unreconstructed hippies of the 1960s dominate the faculty and teach a political ideology that disdains America.’’
Actually, said Colman McCarthy in The Washington Post, it’s the military that holds a repugnant worldview—that war is a noble endeavor. That’s why the ROTC doesn’t belong on college campuses. “ROTC and its warrior ethic taint the intellectual purity of a school,” which should seek to “rise above the foul idea that nations can kill and destroy their way to peace.” But as long as this nation needs a military, said Eliot A. Cohen, also in the Post, there’s simply no excuse for excluding students who’ve reached “the pinnacle of our educational system.” Simply put, “these young people, who will some day run our businesses and our politics, should share the burden of national defense.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published