Should courts let defendants conceal racist tattoos?
A Florida court is paying to cover a swastika on an accused murderer's neck so jurors won't be biased. Is this taking "innocent until proven guilty" too far?

This week, a Florida jury is hearing testimony in the murder retrial of John Allen Ditullio, a man accused of stabbing his neighbor and killing a teenager — but they won't be seeing everything. As in the original trial (which ended in a jury deadlock), the jurors won't see the avowed neo-Nazi's prominently placed tattoos, including images of a swastika on his neck and barbed wire on his face. After defense lawyers argued the "scary" tattoos would prejudice the jury against Ditullio, the judge decided the court should pay a makeup artist to cover them up. Is this a valid use of taxpayer dollars? (Watch an MSNBC report about the controversy)
A trial must be fair: This might be distasteful, says Douglas Keene in The Jury Room, but verdicts are supposed to be based on the evidence, not on how the defendant looks. Ditullio's "offensive tattoos" would almost certainly make jurors more inclined to believe he committed the crimes in question — and "raise the probability that a conviction could be overturned."
"Tattoos: When should you clean up your witness?"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The defense should pay: If Ditullio wants to cover up his tattoos so the jury will "judge him less harshly," fine, say the editors of the Boston University Daily Free Press. After all, defense lawyers make scraggly defendants put on a suit and comb their hair all the time so they'll make a good impression. But the makeup costs $125 every time this guy appears in court, and "the money should come out of his own defense fund," not from taxpayers.
This is a small matter when you consider the stakes: The mother of the 17-year-old victim is, of course, "outraged," says Daniel Bates in Britain's Daily Mail. And the cosmetologist's bill could run into the thousands of dollars, as the trial might go on for weeks. But the money doesn't loom so large when you consider that if Ditullio is found guilty, he could be put to death.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published