Airport screening: Would profiling work?

Amid an outcry over pat-downs and scanners, some commentators say TSA authorities should leave most flyers alone and focus on Muslims. Realistic — or racist?

Would racial and religious profiling be more effective than the TSA's controversial screening techniques?
(Image credit: Getty)

The battle over the TSA's invasive new airport screening techniques has revived debate over another controversial security option: Racial and religious profiling. Conservative critics who feel that "naked scanners" and full-body pat-downs trample the privacy rights of law-abiding travelers say that authorities should focus on Muslims and people from the Middle East who share traits like age and nationality with the profile of many terrorists. Would it be fair — and effective — to subject Muslims to more invasive screening than other passengers? (Watch a CNN discussion about airport profiling)

The time for profiling has come: "Profiling has become a dirty word, synonymous with prejudice, racism, and bigotry," says Asra Q. Nomani at The Daily Beast, but the sad truth is that many terrorists share "one common denominator": Many of them are Muslim. Singling out people with similar backgrounds isn't about racism, but "threat assessment." So, as a Muslim woman, I say, "profile me."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up