Should the U.S. scale back operations in Afghanistan?

Afghan president Hamid Karzai says the U.S. military needs to reduce its visibility in his country to avoid driving people into the arms of the Taliban. Should America do what he says?

The long-term presence of U.S. troops in Afghanistan would only worsen the war, says Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
(Image credit: Getty)

Afghan President Hamid Karzai says American troops should hand over more security duties to local forces, arguing that having so many foreign soldiers around fuels the Taliban insurgency. His views, expressed in an interview with The Washington Post, signal a possible rift with General David Petraeus, who is responsible for the counter-insurgency strategy being used, and the Obama administration, which is suggesting that Americans will be needed to fight in Afghanistan for several more years. Should the U.S. be listening to Karzai? (Watch a Fox News discussion about Karzai's request)

Karzai is nuts — his soldiers are not ready: The night raids that Karzai wants the U.S. to suspend are "destroying the Taliban leadership," says Merv Benson at Prairie Pundit. No doubt the Taliban would be happy if they ended, but the Afghan government should be begging for them to continue. Some day Afghan troops should take over security, but not until "three or four years after the enemy has been eliminated."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up