Is burning the Koran free speech?

Justice Stephen Breyer says torching the Muslim holy book might not be a protected freedom — and critics find him in contempt

Justice Stephen Breyer questions the extent of coverage the First Amendment offers Americans in this Internet age.
(Image credit: Getty)

Last week, a Florida pastor backed down from a plan to burn Korans on Sept. 11 to protest Islamist terrorism — but not before the news provoked deadly riots in Afghanistan. Now a new debate has erupted after Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer told ABC News that Americans may not have a constitutionally protected right to torch Muslim holy books. The right to speak your mind, Breyer said, "doesn’t mean you can shout 'fire' in a crowded theater," because people could get trampled. Similarly, given the possibility that Koran burning could incite violence, courts might reject a free-speech defense. Would it be unconstitutional to ban Koran burning? (Watch Terry Jones make his case)

Of course it would: Breyer's "analogy is extremely poor," say the editors of The Washington Times. Early in the 20th century, the "crowded theater" metaphor emerged when the court ruled that free speech could be curtailed to avoid a "clear and present danger." But "safely burning a Koran" is just a symbolic act that "does not physically threaten anyone." Any riots that erupt are "political theater," just like the Koran burning itself.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up