The "future of serious journalism" is in jeopardy, says Washington Post media columnist Howard Kurtz. With people now finding their news by searching online "for subjects, and people, in which they're interested" — no longer "patiently turning from national news to Metro to Style to the sports section" — journalists have become slaves to "the Google gods," who demand "the right keywords" be attached to every story. If a headline connects with popular search terms, likely involving celebrities and/or sex scandals, you are likely to enjoy a flood of readers. That is, of course, a primary goal of any publication. But this chase for "hits" is a short-term game with disturbing implications, says Kurtz. An excerpt:
The dilemma goes well beyond headlines to what content to post on your site, and people like me are hardly exempt. If I write about Radar revealing Mel Gibson's abusive calls to his girlfriend, or the coverage of Tiger Woods' multiple mistresses, my traffic will undoubtedly soar above that for a sober report on how nonprofit groups are pursuing investigative reporting. Like most of my colleagues, I try not to let that affect my judgment, but it hangs in the ether...
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
An ingredient in Coca-Cola may be funding Sudan's warUnder the Radar Global trade in gum arabic centres on the African nation – and proceeds bankroll conflict between the army and paramilitary rebels
-
Homes for multi-generational familiesFeature Featuring a 1900 Jacobean-style mansion in Massachusetts and a 22.5-acre compound in California
-
The Week contest: Foot PSAPuzzles and Quizzes
