ObamaCare's stealth assault on small business
An obscure provision in the new health-care law will require entrepreneurs to spend a great deal more time filling out tax forms. It’s not the sort of change that should have been sneaked through
Small-business owners face a world of troubles these days: a weak economy, impending health-care mandates, the prospect of higher taxes.
But one concern you hear about more and more is a huge new expansion in their IRS reporting requirements — a paperwork nightmare that will commence in 2012.
I got an earful on the subject after a recent speech to a group of employers in a small vacation town. They owned shops, a garage, restaurants. They did all their own bookkeeping at nights and on weekends. They did not enjoy it, but they were used to it. But now, they feared their lives were about to be consumed by a new bureaucracy.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
They have reason to be afraid. Right now, business owners file two forms when they employ people: a W-2 for employees and a 1099 for freelance contractors. A typical small business files 10 such forms, at a cost of 3–5 hours of time per year.
Embedded in the new health-care law, however, is a staggering requirement: using a new form — the 1099k — small businesses will have to start reporting all their purchases of goods from other businesses. (You can see a draft version of the 1099K form on the IRS website.)
Did you rent a car or stay in a hotel? 1099K.
Buy ink and paper from Staples? 1099K.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Lease space in a local mall? 1099K.
Collect revenue from PayPal, eBay, or Amazon merchants? 1099K.
And don’t forget to collect each company’s taxpayer ID number while you are at it!
There are some exceptions: Businesses with revenues of less than $20,000 are exempt, as are purchases that total less than $600 for the year. Non-exempt businesses, however, are looking at a sudden lurch from approximately 10 forms per year to probably several hundred.
The IRS intends the measure as a revenue-enhancer. If more transactions are reported, more can be taxed. The provision got tucked into the health-care bill not because it has any relation to health-care, but in order to plump the revenue side of health-care reform—and thus tilt the numbers to make the total bill look less costly.
Nobody will excuse tax evasion, of course. But there should be some proportion between the revenue value to government and the time cost to business owners.
One reason that the United States does not have a VAT is that Congress has declined to add “tax collector of first resort” to the responsibilities of the small-business owner. If that is now to change, let’s make the change in the full light of day—with a full debate of costs and benefits—not stealthily in an obscure addendum to the most important piece of social legislation since the 1960s.
We should have invited those small-business owners I met in that vacation town into the debate in advance of the decision, not after the fact.
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures Firing shells, burning ballots, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
Damian Barr shares his favourite books
The Week Recommends The writer and broadcaster picks works by Alice Walker, Elif Shafak and others
By The Week UK Published
-
The Great Mughals: a 'treasure trove' of an exhibition
The Week Recommends The V&A's new show is 'spell-binding'
By The Week UK Published
-
Washington's deficit-hawk pretenders
feature Even if the GOP's spending cuts are larger than Obama's, they would fritter away the proceeds on tax cuts and repealing health-care reform
By Brad DeLong Last updated
-
The GOP's health-care dilemma
feature Coverage for all: We do it, why not say it?
By David Frum Last updated
-
A realistic plan for reforming health care
feature Repeal isn't going to happen. Instead, Republicans should focus on fixing financing and over-regulation
By David Frum Last updated
-
Obama will return to health care
feature With financial reform underway and immigration reform coming next, it appears Barack Obama has moved on from the health-care debate. Just wait
By Robert Shrum Last updated
-
How immigration reform threatens health reform
opinion If immigration reform legalizes the 10-12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., who pays for their ObamaCare?
By David Frum Last updated
-
The curious triumph of RomneyCare
feature Neither Democrats nor Republicans have an incentive to discuss the Republican roots of Obama's health-care plan. But that doesn't mean they're not real—and deep
By Brad DeLong Last updated
-
Heroes and villains of health reform
feature It's not over—yet. But here's how history will record the profiles in courage and cowardice we've witnessed in the health-reform battle.
By Robert Shrum Last updated
-
Will health reform cause the next bailout?
feature President Obama has escalated his attacks on insurers. But if reform passes, his harsh words may be the prelude to an embrace
By David Frum Last updated