"Soccer is in a league of its own when it comes to substituting athletics for politics," says Gerard Baker in The Wall Street Journal. When American and British fans sit down on either side of the Atlantic to watch the U.S. play England in the World Cup on Saturday, more than a simple game of soccer will be at stake. For the English, it is a chance to beat their "longtime friend, occasional foe, distant relative, [and] superpower usurper." While England has won seven of the two rivals' nine meetings on the soccer field, that is an "incomplete scorecard," says Baker, when you look at the clashes that have taken place in other realms:
It doesn't take into account the hefty defeat of 1776 (an early showing for the Tea Party crowd); the late winner the U.S. scored in 1781; the thumping victory on away soil the English achieved in 1812...or that very long game that lasted from the late 19th to the early 20th century and which resulted—after overtime and penalty kicks—in England finally ceding its crown as Political, Economic and Military World Champions to the ill-bred upstarts from across the Atlantic.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
The AI arms raceTalking Point The fixation on AI-powered economic growth risks drowning out concerns around the technology which have yet to be resolved
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis worldIn the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
-
Crossword: February 22, 2025The Week's daily crossword puzzle
