Feature

Engagement rings that inspire...lawsuits?

When a bride backs out of her wedding, can her fiancé sue for the ring? Slate's Casey Greenfield looks at the litigious side of engagement

It's the worst-case scenario of weddings, the sort of thing that could make Miss Manners implode: A bitter broken engagement leads to the courtroom, where jilted lovers duke it out over rights to the wedding ring. Legally, a bride-to-be's diamond — which often costs tens of thousands of dollars — actually represents a "binding contract," explains Slate's Casey Greenfield. If the bride breaks her "promise" to marry, she's bound to return the ring. But this law sometimes gets a little murky. An excerpt:

“Christopher Reinhold of Staten Island says the diamond ring he gave to Collette DiPierro, who broke off their engagement in September 2009 after four months and growing doubts, is rightfully his. He has sued her to get it back.…But DiPierro says that because Reinhold proposed on her birthday, the $17,500 ring was a gift, not a token symbolizing a promise to marry. So she can keep it. Or, actually, spend it: Neither Reinhold nor DiPierro claims sentimental attachment; both would be happy with the ring's cash value.

“Contract law takes the view that the exchange of a ring for the promise to wed constitutes a binding contract. It's not the most romantic narrative, but in a court fight over a diamond, romance already lies in the dust....”

Read the entire article at Slate.

Recommended

The Week contest: Streamlined palace
King Charles III.
Feature

The Week contest: Streamlined palace

6 outstanding homes in Ohio
House
Feature

6 outstanding homes in Ohio

The Week contest: Sailing pumpkin
A pumpkin boat.
Feature

The Week contest: Sailing pumpkin

6 magnificent Victorian homes
House
Feature

6 magnificent Victorian homes

Most Popular

Will Ukraine be Putin's downfall?
Vladimir Putin.
Opinion

Will Ukraine be Putin's downfall?

Returning the Crown Jewels
Queen Elizabeth.
Briefing

Returning the Crown Jewels

Hochul advances plan to require zero-emission cars by 2035
Kathy Hochul.
bestie in a tessie

Hochul advances plan to require zero-emission cars by 2035