Death by firing squad: Cruel and unusual?
A convicted killer in Utah is scheduled to die in June. He would be the first U.S. prisoner executed by firing squad since 1996
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d579/0d5790714060ab7a65a1ca394a38075ad6315533" alt="Ronnie Lee Gardner is the first inmate to ask for death by firing squad since 1996. Is this "cruel and inhumane" punishment?"
A condemned murderer in Utah rekindled an old debate about the death penalty this month with seven quick words: "I would like the firing squad, please," Ronnie Lee Gardner told the judge who signed his death warrant. Gardner, slated to die in June, would be the first U.S. inmate to die by firing squad since 1996, and only the third since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Gardner told a cousin he prefers the method — currently used in no state but Utah — because he's been shot before. But critics say it's inhumane. Are firing squads "cruel and unusual"? (Watch an NBC report about Ronnie Lee Gardner's request)
Even Utah recognizes this as "barbaric": "Forty-nine states ban execution via firing squad," says Megha Desai in PRWatch.org. And that includes Utah, which only gave Ronnie Lee Gardner that option because his crime preceded the ban. This is a "barbaric" practice, and the fact that it's still happening in this day and age is a disgrace.
"A firing squad execution, and Utah worries about tourism?"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sorry, firing squads are okay under the Constitution: The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only prohibits punishment that is "cruel and unusual," says Michael Dodd in Examiner.com, and firing squads are neither. They've been used plenty through American history. Besides, Gardner chose it, so he has waived his right to complain the method is unconstitutional.
"Utah man to be executed by firing squad: is it legal?"
Utah lawmakers thought firing squads were embarrassing, not cruel: Utah lawmakers didn't move to eliminate the firing squad over "any discomfort with the method itself," says Jennifer Dobner in the Associated Press. They wanted to avoid having their state caricatured as a throwback to "Old West" justice, and deprive publicity-seeking killers of a way to go out in a "blaze of glory."
"Condemned Utah killer will face firing squad"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How worried should we be about asteroids?
Today's Big Question Odds of asteroid 2024 YR4 hitting Earth have fluctuated wildly this week
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Why does Elon Musk take his son everywhere?
Talking Point With his four-year-old 'emotional support human' by his side, what message is the world's richest man sending?
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Why are sinkholes becoming more common?
Podcast Plus, will Saudi investment help create the "Netflix of sport"? And why has New Zealand's new tourism campaign met with a savage reception?
By The Week UK Published