Taking stock of a ‘special relationship’
Will Britain scrap the phrase most often used to describe British-U.S. ties?
Ever since Winston Churchill used the phrase “special relationship” to describe British-U.S. ties, said Nicholas Watt in The Guardian, it has been invoked by “prime ministers of all hues.” But this week, Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee declared the phrase “potentially misleading” and recommended that it be scrapped. In a report on Anglo-American ties, the committee said the phrase had contributed to the “perception that the British government was a subservient poodle to the U.S.” in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, when Prime Minister Tony Blair was widely seen as having supported President Bush’s ill-conceived war while getting nothing in return. From now on, the committee said, Britain should be “less deferential and more willing to say no to the U.S. on those issues where the two countries’ interests and values diverge.”
What took us so long? asked John Charmley in The Times. For more than 60 years, we have “adopted an attitude of more or less complete subservience to the Americans,” trotting obediently after them even as they repeatedly kicked us. During the crisis over the nationalization of the Suez Canal in the 1950s, for example, the U.S. “dropped us in the guano” by siding with Egypt instead of with us. And during the Falkland Islands dispute in the 1980s, President Reagan waffled over whether to back Britain, its firm ally, or Argentina, which at the time was “a nasty dictatorship.” Thank goodness Britain is finally going to stop “behaving like a love-struck co-dependent.”
Our love was always unrequited, said Peter McKay in the Daily Mail. The Americans never saw us as equals—which is not surprising considering that American high schools teach that the U.S. generously bailed us out in both world wars, when the truth is “that we paid fantastic over-the-odds sums for the equipment we bought from them.” Americans are also told that they selflessly protected us from the Soviet Union, when the reality is that the U.S. “colonized Europe with military bases” to ensure that war with the Soviets “would be fought on our soil, rather than theirs.” We hardly need a committee of MPs to tell us that the special relationship is dead.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Surely a bit of “skepticism is in order,” said Bruce Anderson in The Independent. We’ve heard this kind of talk before. Those who announce the demise of the “special relationship” usually profess to have made a “shocking discovery” that America puts its own interests first. What of it? So does every country, including Britain. Yes, the Americans have a tendency toward unilateralism, and yes, they can be difficult. Our interests are not identical. But we share many of the same values, and when times are tough, we are there for each other. “In foreign affairs, there is only one certainty: There will be regular proclamations of the death of the special relationship. But the hearse will never arrive.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Colombo's wetlands: how the 'lungs' of Sri Lanka's capital are being restored
The revival of the ecosystems could prove a 'valuable lesson' for the world
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: October 2, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku hard: October 2, 2024
The Week's daily hard sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
No equipment for Afghanistan
feature The U.S. has reportedly decided to hand over to Pakistan some $7 billion worth of American military hardware currently in Afghanistan.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Crudely insulting our allies
feature Well, at least we know now what the Americans really think of us.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Spied-upon Germans are not mollified
feature In the wake of revelations last year about the NSA's spying activities, relations between Germany and the U.S. have been at an all-time low.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Is a deal with the U.S. in Iran’s interest?
feature The “unprecedented enthusiasm” of Western diplomats after the talks in Geneva suggests they received unexpected concessions from the Iranians.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Sowing chaos in Libya
feature The kidnapping of Abu Anas al-Libi is an outrage committed against Libyan sovereignty—and it will have repercussions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Europe is complicit in spying
feature It’s not just the Americans who have developed a gigantic spying apparatus.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Protecting Snowden
feature American whistle-blower Edward Snowden has proved a master spy with his “meticulously timed operation.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Listening in on Europeans
feature Europeans are apoplectic over the U.S. National Security Agency's massive PRISM surveillance program.
By The Week Staff Last updated